Radeon RX 460 Mobile vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 780 6 GB GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Ti GTX 780 Ti 6 GB GTX TITAN BLACK GTX TITAN Z
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 460 Mobile Radeon RX 470 Mobile Radeon RX 480 Mobile Radeon RX 490M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN Z with Radeon RX 460 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN Z
2014
12 GB GDDR5, 375 Watt
21.61
+129%

GTX TITAN Z outperforms RX 460 Mobile by a whopping 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX TITAN Z GTX TITAN Z
RX 460 Mobile RX 460 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking247449
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.2512.64
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK110BBaffin
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 May 2014 (10 years ago)8 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $86

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5760896
Core clock speed705 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHz1180 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate210.266.08
Floating-point processing power5.046 TFLOPS2.115 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs24056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width768-bit (384-bit per GPU)128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth672 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX TITAN Z 21.61
+129%
RX 460 Mobile 9.43

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX TITAN Z 17130
+235%
RX 460 Mobile 5108

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
+129%
35
−129%

Cost per frame, $

1080p37.49
−1426%
2.46
+1426%
  • RX 460 Mobile has 1426% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
World of Tanks 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
+0%
22
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
World of Tanks 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN Z and RX 460 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN Z is 129% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 21.61 9.43
Recency 28 May 2014 8 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 55 Watt

GTX TITAN Z has a 129.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 460 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 581.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 460 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN Z is a desktop card while Radeon RX 460 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN Z GeForce GTX TITAN Z
vs
R9 390 Radeon R9 390
RX 460 Mobile Radeon RX 460 Mobile
vs
HD 8970M Radeon HD 8970M
GTX TITAN Z GeForce GTX TITAN Z
vs
RX 580 Radeon RX 580
GTX 980 980
vs
GTX TITAN Z TITAN Z
GTX 780 Ti 780 Ti
vs
GTX TITAN Z TITAN Z
GTX 960 960
vs
GTX TITAN Z TITAN Z
GTX 1050 Ti 1050 Ti
vs
GTX TITAN Z TITAN Z
GTX 750 Ti 750 Ti
vs
GTX TITAN Z TITAN Z
GTX 1060 3 GB 1060 3 GB
vs
GTX TITAN Z TITAN Z
GTX 1060 6 GB 1060 6 GB
vs
GTX TITAN Z TITAN Z
GT 710 GT 710
vs
GTX TITAN Z GTX TITAN Z

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 76 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 17 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.