Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon HD 6470M Radeon HD 6650M Radeon HD 6770M Radeon HD 6950M Radeon HD 6970M Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire Radeon HD 6970M Mac Edition Radeon HD 6970M Rebrand Radeon HD 6970M X2 Radeon HD 6990M Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire Radeon HD 6990M Rebrand

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN Z with Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN Z
2014
12 GB GDDR5, 375 Watt
23.18
+124%

GTX TITAN Z outperforms HD 6990M Crossfire by a whopping 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX TITAN Z GTX TITAN Z
HD 6990M Crossfire HD 6990M Crossfire

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking238440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.27no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK110BBlackcomb XTX
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 May 2014 (10 years ago)12 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores57602240
Core clock speed705 MHz715 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million2x1700 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Wattno data
Texture fill rate210.2no data
Floating-point processing power5.046 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs240no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2x2 GB
Memory bus width768-bit (384-bit per GPU)256 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s900 MHz
Memory bandwidth672 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortno data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p220−230
+122%
99
−122%
Full HD230−240
+117%
106
−117%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.04no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN Z and HD 6990M Crossfire compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN Z is 122% faster in 900p
  • GTX TITAN Z is 117% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 23.18 10.34
Recency 28 May 2014 12 July 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

GTX TITAN Z has a 124.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN Z is a desktop card while Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
AMD Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN Z GeForce GTX TITAN Z
vs
GTX TITAN BLACK GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
HD 6990M Crossfire Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
vs
GTX 580M SLI GeForce GTX 580M SLI
GTX TITAN Z GeForce GTX TITAN Z
vs
R9 390 Radeon R9 390
GT 730 GeForce GT 730
vs
R7 435 OEM Radeon R7 435 OEM
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
Pro V7300X Radeon Pro V7300X
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
GTX 960 OEM GeForce GTX 960 OEM
vs
Playstation 3 GPU 28nm Playstation 3 GPU 28nm
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
H100 SXM5 96 GB H100 SXM5 96 GB
GTX TITAN Z GeForce GTX TITAN Z
vs
HD 6990 Radeon HD 6990
GTX 760 OEM GeForce GTX 760 OEM
vs
R7 Graphics Radeon R7 Graphics
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
Tiger Lake GT2 Tiger Lake GT2
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
GTX 650 Ti Boost GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
Quadro K600 Quadro K600

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 50 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.