ATI Mobility Radeon vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN Z with Mobility Radeon, including specs and performance data.
TITAN Z outperforms Mobility by a whopping 1703% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 298 | 1105 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.13 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.37 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Rage 6 (2000−2007) |
| GPU code name | GK110B | M6 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 May 2014 (12 years ago) | 1 December 2001 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5760 ×2 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 705 MHz | 144 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 7,080 million | 30 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 375 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 210.2 ×2 | 0.43 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | no data |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 1 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2 | 3 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1536 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 3-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB ×2 | 16 MB |
| Memory bus width | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) ×2 | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 144 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s ×2 | 2.304 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Multi monitor support | 4 displays | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| HDCP | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Blu Ray 3D | + | - |
| 3D Gaming | + | - |
| 3D Vision | + | - |
| 3D Vision Live | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 7.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.27 | 1.18 |
| Recency | 28 May 2014 | 1 December 2001 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 180 nm |
GTX TITAN Z has a 1703% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 76700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN Z is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
