Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
750 GM206 750 v2 950 950 Low Power 950 OEM 960 960 OEM 970 980 980 Ti TITAN X Tegra X1
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 3 5 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X with Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN X
2015, $999
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
30.08
+261%

TITAN X outperforms 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a whopping 261% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking212550
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.79no data
Power efficiency9.2642.81
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM200Vega
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 March 2015 (11 years ago)7 January 2020 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072512
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1075 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate209.1no data
Floating-point processing power6.691 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs192no data
L1 Cache1.1 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options4x-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2no data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+241%
22
−241%
1440p55−60
+244%
16
−244%
4K35−40
+250%
10
−250%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.32no data
1440p18.16no data
4K28.54no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 43
+0%
43
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Fortnite 47
+0%
47
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 19
+0%
19
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 48
+0%
48
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%
Dota 2 51
+0%
51
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 16
+0%
16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+0%
21
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%
Dota 2 48
+0%
48
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 18
+0%
18
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21
+0%
21
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%
Metro Exodus 10
+0%
10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
+0%
22
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN X and RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN X is 241% faster in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN X is 244% faster in 1440p
  • GTX TITAN X is 250% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.08 8.34
Recency 17 March 2015 7 January 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

GTX TITAN X has a 261% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 1567% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
GTX 485M SLI GeForce GTX 485M SLI
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
Arc A750 Arc A750
GT 730 OEM NVIDIA GT 730 OEM
vs
RTX A2000 A2000
GTX TITAN X NVIDIA GTX TITAN X
vs
GRID K160Q K160Q
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1080 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GTX TITAN X NVIDIA GTX TITAN X
vs
Instinct Vega Vega
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1060 3 GB GP104 GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB GP104
GTX TITAN X NVIDIA GTX TITAN X
vs
PRO W7700 W7700
GTX TITAN X NVIDIA TITAN X
vs
RTX 5080 5080
GT 720 NVIDIA GT 720
vs
HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
GT 720 NVIDIA GT 720
vs
R7 M465X M465X
GT 720 NVIDIA GT 720
vs
G210 OEM Rev. 2 OEM Rev. 2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 303 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1702 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN X or Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.