Radeon RX 5600M vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

#ad 
Buy
VS
#ad 
Buy
Radeon RX 5300M Radeon RX 5500M Radeon RX 5600M Radeon RX 5700M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X with Radeon RX 5600M, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN X
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
28.58
+44.7%

GTX TITAN X outperforms RX 5600M by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
RX 5600M RX 5600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking176261
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.92no data
Power efficiency9.0410.42
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGM200Navi 10
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 March 2015 (10 years ago)7 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722304
Core clock speed1000 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz1265 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate209.1182.2
Floating-point processing power6.691 TFLOPS5.829 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs192144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options4x-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX TITAN X 28.58
+44.7%
RX 5600M 19.75

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX TITAN X 12768
+44.7%
RX 5600M 8826

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+42.9%
84
−42.9%
1440p80−85
+40.4%
57
−40.4%
4K40−45
+29%
31
−29%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.33no data
1440p12.49no data
4K24.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 112
+0%
112
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 104
+0%
104
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Far Cry 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+0%
64
+0%
Valorant 115
+0%
115
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN X and RX 5600M compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN X is 43% faster in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN X is 40% faster in 1440p
  • GTX TITAN X is 29% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 28.58 19.75
Recency 17 March 2015 7 July 2020
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt

GTX TITAN X has a 44.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 5600M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5600M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop card while Radeon RX 5600M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1660 Super GeForce GTX 1660 Super
RX 5600M Radeon RX 5600M
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
HD 6750 Radeon HD 6750
vs
HD 8790M HD 8790M
ATI HD 4450 Radeon HD 4450
vs
RTX 4090 D RTX 4090 D
RTX 4070 10 GB RTX 4070 10 GB
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB 1060 6 GB
GTX 950 OEM GeForce GTX 950 OEM
vs
P106-090 P106 090
GT 710 OEM GeForce GT 710 OEM
vs
RTX 3050 6 GB RTX 3050 6 GB
RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh
vs
GTX TITAN X TITAN X
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
Arc A530M Arc A530M
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
vs
GTX 650 Ti OEM 650 Ti OEM
GTX 650 Ti GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
Arc A530M Arc A530M
GT 620 GeForce GT 620
vs
ATI X300 SE X300 SE

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 257 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 238 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN X or Radeon RX 5600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.