GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs GTX TITAN X

Place in performance ranking	145	82
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	15.71	no data
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GM200	GN20-E6
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	17 March 2015 (9 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data
Current price	$290 (0.3x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	5888
CUDA cores	3072	no data
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	915 MHz
Boost clock speed	1075 MHz	1480 MHz
Number of transistors	8,000 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	125 Watt (80 - 125 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	192 billion/sec	248.2
Floating-point performance	6,691 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX TITAN X and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	6-pin + 8-pin	no data
SLI options	4x	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.5 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	no data
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	no data
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	90−95 −28.9%	116 +28.9%
1440p	55−60 −32.7%	73 +32.7%
4K	35−40 −34.3%	47 +34.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

129

−24%

160−170
+24%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 −23.3%	90−95 +23.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	107 −21.5%	130−140 +21.5%
Battlefield 5	130−140 −19.4%	160−170 +19.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −19%	100−105 +19%
Cyberpunk 2077	111 −17.1%	130−140 +17.1%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −23.6%	110−120 +23.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−110 −16.5%	120−130 +16.5%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 −21.8%	190−200 +21.8%
Hitman 3	117 −19.7%	140−150 +19.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 −22.8%	210−220 +22.8%
Metro Exodus	110−120 −19.7%	140−150 +19.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 −21.2%	120−130 +21.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	254 −18.1%	300−310 +18.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	107 −21.5%	130−140 +21.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 −23.3%	90−95 +23.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	89 −23.6%	110−120 +23.6%
Battlefield 5	130−140 −19.4%	160−170 +19.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −19%	100−105 +19%
Cyberpunk 2077	89 −23.6%	110−120 +23.6%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −23.6%	110−120 +23.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−110 −16.5%	120−130 +16.5%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 −21.8%	190−200 +21.8%
Hitman 3	57 −22.8%	70−75 +22.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 −22.8%	210−220 +22.8%
Metro Exodus	110−120 −19.7%	140−150 +19.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 −21.2%	120−130 +21.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	202 −23.8%	250−260 +23.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	188 −22.3%	230−240 +22.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −18.8%	120−130 +18.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 −23.3%	90−95 +23.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	78 −21.8%	95−100 +21.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −19%	100−105 +19%
Cyberpunk 2077	81 −23.5%	100−105 +23.5%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −23.6%	110−120 +23.6%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 −21.8%	190−200 +21.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 −22.8%	210−220 +22.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	178 −23.6%	220−230 +23.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	103 −16.5%	120−130 +16.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	68 −17.6%	80−85 +17.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95−100
−21.2%

120−130

+21.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 −23.5%	100−105 +23.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 −22.4%	120−130 +22.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −19.6%	55−60 +19.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	61 −23%	75−80 +23%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −23.1%	80−85 +23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	50 −20%	60−65 +20%
Far Cry 5	100 −20%	120−130 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −13.6%	100−105 +13.6%
Hitman 3	69 −23.2%	85−90 +23.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −19.6%	110−120 +19.6%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −21.8%	95−100 +21.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	137 −24.1%	170−180 +24.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −21%	75−80 +21%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50 −20%	60−65 +20%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

70−75

−18.1%

85−90
+18.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −16.3%	50−55 +16.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
Hitman 3	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −20.4%	65−70 +20.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	76 −18.4%	90−95 +18.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	36 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	26 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −20%	30−33 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −18.6%	70−75 +18.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −20.4%	65−70 +20.4%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −13.6%	50−55 +13.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	29 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−18.4%

45−50
+18.4%

This is how GTX TITAN X and RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 29% faster in 1080p
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 33% faster in 1440p
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 34% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.69	41.90
Recency	17 March 2015	4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	125 Watt