GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs GTX TITAN X

Place in the ranking	157	130
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.11	no data
Power efficiency	9.26	21.93
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GM200	TU104B
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	17 March 2015 (9 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	2560
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1140 MHz
Boost clock speed	1075 MHz	1380 MHz
Number of transistors	8,000 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	209.1	220.8
Floating-point processing power	6.691 TFLOPS	7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	64
TMUs	192	160
Tensor Cores	no data	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data
SLI options	4x	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.5 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	-	+
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
VR Ready	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.140
CUDA	5.2	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	110−120 −9.1%	120 +9.1%
1440p	65−70 −16.9%	76 +16.9%
4K	35−40 −11.4%	39 +11.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	9.08	no data
1440p	15.37	no data
4K	28.54	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

+0%

60−65

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104 +0%	104 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	83 +0%	83 +0%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	115 +0%	115 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry 5	146 +0%	146 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	162 +0%	162 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Hitman 3	105 +0%	105 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	119 +0%	119 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	71 +0%	71 +0%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	101 +0%	101 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry 5	119 +0%	119 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	112 +0%	112 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Hitman 3	104 +0%	104 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	97 +0%	97 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	63 +0%	63 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	61 +0%	61 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75 +0%	75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry 5	83 +0%	83 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Hitman 3	92 +0%	92 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	121 +0%	121 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	87 +0%	87 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	61 +0%	61 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

108

+0%

108

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	75 +0%	75 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	56 +0%	56 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55 +0%	55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	60 +0%	60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Hitman 3	61 +0%	61 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Metro Exodus	89 +0%	89 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 +0%	41 +0%
Hitman 3	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Metro Exodus	67 +0%	67 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	59 +0%	59 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	36 +0%	36 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	32 +0%	32 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	31 +0%	31 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	25 +0%	25 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

This is how GTX TITAN X and RTX 2070 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 9% faster in 1080p
RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 17% faster in 1440p
RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 11% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.49	36.49
Recency	17 March 2015	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	115 Watt

GTX TITAN X has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 117.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX TITAN X and GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.