GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs TITAN X
Aggregated performance score
TITAN X outperforms TITAN BLACK by 44% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 146 | 217 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 15.36 | 2.66 |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
GPU code name | GM200 | GK110B |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 17 March 2015 (9 years ago) | 18 February 2014 (10 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $999 |
Current price | $290 (0.3x MSRP) | $799 (0.8x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GTX TITAN X has 477% better value for money than GTX TITAN BLACK.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3072 | 2880 |
CUDA cores | 3072 | 2880 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 889 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz | 980 MHz |
Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 7,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 192 billion/sec | 213 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops | 5,645 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
SLI options | 4x | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 336.5 GB/s | 336 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort |
Multi monitor support | 4 displays | 4 displays |
HDMI | + | + |
HDCP | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Blu Ray 3D | no data | + |
3D Gaming | no data | + |
3D Vision | no data | + |
GameStream | + | no data |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | no data |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | no data |
GameWorks | + | no data |
3D Vision Live | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
TITAN X outperforms TITAN BLACK by 44% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
TITAN X outperforms TITAN BLACK by 44% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
TITAN X outperforms TITAN BLACK by 42% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
TITAN X outperforms TITAN BLACK by 126% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
TITAN X outperforms TITAN BLACK by 65% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.
Octane Render OctaneBench
This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
TITAN X outperforms TITAN BLACK by 24% in Octane Render OctaneBench.
Unigine Heaven 4.0
This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark, a newer version of Unigine 3.0 with relatively small differences. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. The benchmark is still sometimes used, despite its significant age, as it was released back in 2013.
Benchmark coverage: 1%
TITAN X outperforms TITAN BLACK by 46% in Unigine Heaven 4.0.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 33.69 | 23.36 |
Recency | 17 March 2015 | 18 February 2014 |
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 6 GB |
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.