GeForce GT 755M SLI vs GTX TITAN X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 750M GT 750M Mac Edition GT 750M SLI GT 755M GT 755M Mac Edition GT 755M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X with GeForce GT 755M SLI, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN X
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
32.45
+286%

GTX TITAN X outperforms GT 755M SLI by a whopping 286% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
GT 755M SLI GT 755M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking164502
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.93no data
Power efficiency9.286.00
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM200N14P-?
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 March 2015 (9 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072768
Core clock speed1000 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,000 million2x 1300 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt2x ~50 Watt
Texture fill rate209.1no data
Floating-point processing power6.691 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs192no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options4x-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2x 2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2no data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.2+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+261%
36
−261%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.68no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
World of Tanks 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
World of Tanks 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN X and GT 755M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN X is 261% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.45 8.40
Recency 17 March 2015 1 November 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 2 Watt

GTX TITAN X has a 286.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

GT 755M SLI, on the other hand, has 12400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 755M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop card while GeForce GT 755M SLI is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GT 755M SLI GeForce GT 755M SLI
vs
GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
vs
HD 6350 HD 6350
W4130M W4130M
vs
GTX 1060 3 GB GTX 1060 3 GB
GTX 470 X2 GTX 470 X2
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GTX 1060 6 GB
P3200 Max-Q P3200 Max-Q
vs
GTX 750 v2 GTX 750 v2
GTX 970M SLI GTX 970M SLI
vs
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
R7 Graphics R7 Graphics
vs
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
GeForce MX150 MX150
vs
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
Radeon 625 625
vs
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
ATI V7750 V7750
vs
GT 730 GT 730
RTX 2080 Super Max-Q RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
vs
GTX 770 GTX 770

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 236 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 21 vote

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.