Arc 8-Core iGPU vs GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 780 6 GB GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Ti GTX 780 Ti 6 GB GTX TITAN BLACK GTX TITAN Z
VS
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK with Arc 8-Core iGPU, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN BLACK
2014
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
20.22
+26.9%

GTX TITAN BLACK outperforms Arc 8-Core iGPU by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX TITAN BLACK GTX TITAN BLACK
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking256314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.46no data
Power efficiency6.42no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGK110BMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 February 2014 (11 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28808
Core clock speed889 MHzno data
Boost clock speed980 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate235.2no data
Floating-point processing power5.645 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs240no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth336 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortno data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_2
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX TITAN BLACK 20.22
+26.9%
Arc 8-Core iGPU 15.93

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX TITAN BLACK 11690
+36.5%
Arc 8-Core iGPU 8561

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+25%
36
−25%
1440p21−24
+23.5%
17
−23.5%
4K16−18
+14.3%
14
−14.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p22.20no data
1440p47.57no data
4K62.44no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40
+0%
40
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 28
+0%
28
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+0%
24
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+0%
11
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN BLACK and Arc 8-Core iGPU compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN BLACK is 25% faster in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN BLACK is 24% faster in 1440p
  • GTX TITAN BLACK is 14% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 20.22 15.93
Recency 18 February 2014 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

GTX TITAN BLACK has a 26.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc 8-Core iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Core iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK is a desktop card while Arc 8-Core iGPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN BLACK GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
vs
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GTX TITAN BLACK GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
vs
RX 5500 XT Radeon RX 5500 XT
GTX 750 NVIDIA GTX 750
vs
HD Graphics 515 Graphics 515
GTX 750 NVIDIA GTX 750
vs
HD 7970 X2 7970 X2
GTX 750 NVIDIA GTX 750
vs
T1000 Mobile T1000 Mobile
GTX 750 NVIDIA GTX 750
vs
Apple M1 7-Core GPU Core GPU
GTX TITAN BLACK GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
vs
GTX 965M GeForce GTX 965M
GTX 650 NVIDIA GTX 650
vs
8600M GT 8600M GT
GTX 650 NVIDIA GTX 650
vs
R7 A360 A360
GTX 650 NVIDIA GTX 650
vs
GT 430 PCI 430 PCI
GTX 650 NVIDIA GTX 650
vs
RX 590 GME 590 GME
GTX 760 X2 NVIDIA GTX 760 X2
vs
RX 590 GME 590 GME

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 107 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 65 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK or Arc 8-Core iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.