Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs GeForce GTX 980M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
950A 950M 950M Mac Edition 960A 960M 965M 965M 4 GB 965M SLI 970M 970M SLI 980 Mobile 980 SLI Mobile 980M 980M SLI 980MX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980M SLI with Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980M SLI
2014
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
23.71

6750 GRE 12 GB outperforms 980M SLI by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 980M SLI GTX 980M SLI
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB RX 6750 GRE 12 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking26375
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data86.09
Power efficiency9.1914.76
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 October 2014 (11 years ago)17 October 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$334

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722560
Core clock speed1038 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speed1127 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data413.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.21 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p135
−100%
270−280
+100%
Full HD110
−100%
220−230
+100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.52

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−95.7%
270−280
+95.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 95−100
−97.9%
190−200
+97.9%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−95.7%
270−280
+95.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Escape from Tarkov 90−95
−91.5%
180−190
+91.5%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−89.9%
150−160
+89.9%
Fortnite 120−130
−100%
240−250
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−95.9%
190−200
+95.9%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
−94.8%
150−160
+94.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−97.9%
190−200
+97.9%
Valorant 160−170
−78.6%
300−310
+78.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 95−100
−97.9%
190−200
+97.9%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−95.7%
270−280
+95.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−93.1%
500−550
+93.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Dota 2 120−130
−95.1%
240−250
+95.1%
Escape from Tarkov 90−95
−91.5%
180−190
+91.5%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−89.9%
150−160
+89.9%
Fortnite 120−130
−100%
240−250
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−95.9%
190−200
+95.9%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
−94.8%
150−160
+94.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
−91%
170−180
+91%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−85.2%
100−105
+85.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−97.9%
190−200
+97.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−91.8%
140−150
+91.8%
Valorant 160−170
−78.6%
300−310
+78.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
−97.9%
190−200
+97.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Dota 2 120−130
−95.1%
240−250
+95.1%
Escape from Tarkov 90−95
−91.5%
180−190
+91.5%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−89.9%
150−160
+89.9%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−95.9%
190−200
+95.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−97.9%
190−200
+97.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−91.8%
140−150
+91.8%
Valorant 160−170
−78.6%
300−310
+78.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
−100%
240−250
+100%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
−73.4%
300−310
+73.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−100%
90−95
+100%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−97%
65−70
+97%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−100%
350−400
+100%
Valorant 200−210
−95.1%
400−450
+95.1%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
−91.2%
130−140
+91.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Escape from Tarkov 55−60
−100%
110−120
+100%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−96.4%
110−120
+96.4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−86.4%
110−120
+86.4%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−94.4%
70−75
+94.4%
Valorant 140−150
−95.8%
280−290
+95.8%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
−97.4%
75−80
+97.4%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Dota 2 80−85
−100%
160−170
+100%
Escape from Tarkov 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−89.7%
55−60
+89.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−97.7%
85−90
+97.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
−85.2%
50−55
+85.2%

This is how GTX 980M SLI and RX 6750 GRE 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 100% faster in 900p
  • RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 100% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 23.71 47.61
Recency 7 October 2014 17 October 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 980M SLI has 25% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 100.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 980M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI
GeForce GTX 980M SLI
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 980M SLI GeForce GTX 980M SLI
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
vs
RX 9060 XT 16 GB Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
GTX 980M SLI GeForce GTX 980M SLI
vs
GTX 1080 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GTX 980 SLI Mobile GTX 980 SLI Mobile
vs
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
GTX 980 SLI Mobile GTX 980 SLI Mobile
vs
A100 SXM4 40 GB A100 SXM4 40 GB
GTX 1070 Mobile GTX 1070 Mobile
vs
R7 M465X R7 M465X
GTX 1070 Mobile GTX 1070 Mobile
vs
Pro Vega 56 Pro Vega 56
GTX 1070 Mobile 1070 Mobile
vs
GTX 470 PhysX Edition 470 PhysX Edition
Quadro M5500 M5500
vs
RX 490M RX 490M
Quadro M5500 M5500
vs
Tesla M4 Tesla M4
Quadro M5500 M5500
vs
9600 GT Green Edition 9600 GT Green Edition
Quadro M5500 M5500
vs
L20 L20
GTX 970M SLI GTX 970M SLI
vs
Tesla S2050 Tesla S2050

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 56 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 214 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980M SLI or Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.