Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary vs GeForce GTX 980M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980M SLI with Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980M SLI
2014
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
24.87

5700 XT 50th Anniversary outperforms 980M SLI by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking255122
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.48
Power efficiency9.5813.57
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 October 2014 (11 years ago)7 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722560
Core clock speed1038 MHz1680 MHz
Boost clock speed1127 MHz1980 MHz
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data316.8
Floating-point processing powerno data10.14 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p135
−55.6%
210−220
+55.6%
Full HD110
−54.5%
170−180
+54.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.64

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 140−150
−52.8%
220−230
+52.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−54.5%
85−90
+54.5%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 95−100
−51.5%
150−160
+51.5%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
−52.8%
220−230
+52.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−54.5%
85−90
+54.5%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%
Fortnite 120−130
−54.5%
190−200
+54.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−50%
150−160
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
−50%
120−130
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−50%
150−160
+50%
Valorant 170−180
−57%
270−280
+57%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 95−100
−51.5%
150−160
+51.5%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
−52.8%
220−230
+52.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
−52.1%
400−450
+52.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−54.5%
85−90
+54.5%
Dota 2 120−130
−52%
190−200
+52%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%
Fortnite 120−130
−54.5%
190−200
+54.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−50%
150−160
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
−50%
120−130
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
−52.2%
140−150
+52.2%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−51.8%
85−90
+51.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−50%
150−160
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−55.8%
120−130
+55.8%
Valorant 170−180
−57%
270−280
+57%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
−51.5%
150−160
+51.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−54.5%
85−90
+54.5%
Dota 2 120−130
−52%
190−200
+52%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−50%
150−160
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−50%
150−160
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−55.8%
120−130
+55.8%
Valorant 170−180
−57%
270−280
+57%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
−54.5%
190−200
+54.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−54.5%
85−90
+54.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
−56.4%
280−290
+56.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−56.3%
75−80
+56.3%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−54.3%
270−280
+54.3%
Valorant 200−210
−43.5%
300−310
+43.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
−57.1%
110−120
+57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−55.2%
90−95
+55.2%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−51.5%
100−105
+51.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
−55.7%
95−100
+55.7%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−56.3%
75−80
+56.3%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Valorant 150−160
−53.3%
230−240
+53.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
−53.8%
60−65
+53.8%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Dota 2 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−50%
45−50
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−55.6%
70−75
+55.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

This is how GTX 980M SLI and RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 56% faster in 900p
  • RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 55% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.87 39.64
Recency 7 October 2014 7 July 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 225 Watt

GTX 980M SLI has 13% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, on the other hand, has a 59% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 980M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 57 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 8312 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980M SLI or Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.