GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs GTX 980M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980M SLI and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 980M SLI
2014
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
23.94
+682%

980M SLI outperforms 775M Mac Edition by a whopping 682% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking262801
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.182.35
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 October 2014 (11 years ago)8 November 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721344
Core clock speed1038 MHz797 MHz
Boost clock speed1127 MHzno data
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data89.26
Floating-point processing powerno data2.142 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data112
L1 Cacheno data112 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p135
+744%
16−18
−744%
Full HD110
+686%
14−16
−686%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+763%
16−18
−763%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
+733%
6−7
−733%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 95−100
+700%
12−14
−700%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+763%
16−18
−763%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+690%
10−11
−690%
Fortnite 120−130
+757%
14−16
−757%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+708%
12−14
−708%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+756%
9−10
−756%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
+733%
6−7
−733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+700%
12−14
−700%
Valorant 160−170
+700%
21−24
−700%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 95−100
+700%
12−14
−700%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+763%
16−18
−763%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+763%
30−33
−763%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Dota 2 120−130
+779%
14−16
−779%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+690%
10−11
−690%
Fortnite 120−130
+757%
14−16
−757%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+708%
12−14
−708%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+756%
9−10
−756%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+780%
10−11
−780%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
+733%
6−7
−733%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+800%
6−7
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+700%
12−14
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+711%
9−10
−711%
Valorant 160−170
+700%
21−24
−700%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+700%
12−14
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Dota 2 120−130
+779%
14−16
−779%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+690%
10−11
−690%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+708%
12−14
−708%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
+733%
6−7
−733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+700%
12−14
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+711%
9−10
−711%
Valorant 160−170
+700%
21−24
−700%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+757%
14−16
−757%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+724%
21−24
−724%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+733%
21−24
−733%
Valorant 200−210
+754%
24−27
−754%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+750%
8−9
−750%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+700%
7−8
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+688%
8−9
−688%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+875%
4−5
−875%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+743%
7−8
−743%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Valorant 140−150
+694%
18−20
−694%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+850%
4−5
−850%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Dota 2 80−85
+700%
10−11
−700%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+760%
5−6
−760%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%

This is how GTX 980M SLI and GTX 775M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980M SLI is 744% faster in 900p
  • GTX 980M SLI is 686% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.94 3.06
Recency 7 October 2014 8 November 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 980M SLI has a 682.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 10 months.

GTX 775M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 980M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI
GeForce GTX 980M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 56 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 32 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980M SLI or GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.