Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs GeForce GTX 980

Place in performance ranking	179	531
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	9.81	0.46
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code name	GM204	Polaris 11
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	19 September 2014 (9 years ago)	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	no data
Current price	$339 (0.6x MSRP)	$2000

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980 has 2033% better value for money than Pro WX 4150.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	896
CUDA cores	2048	no data
Core clock speed	1064 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1216 MHz	1053 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	144 billion/sec	58.97
Floating-point performance	4,981 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980 and Radeon Pro WX 4150 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Recommended system power (PSU)	500 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pins	None
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
VGA аnalog display support	+	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	no data	+
GameStream	+	no data
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	no data
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data
BatteryBoost	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 28.80
+330%

Pro WX 4150 6.70

GeForce GTX 980 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4150 by 330% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 980 11122
+330%

Pro WX 4150 2587

GeForce GTX 980 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4150 by 330% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	95 +352%	21−24 −352%
1440p	47 +370%	10−12 −370%
4K	39 +333%	9−10 −333%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

45−50

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	69	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55	no data
Battlefield 5	86	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50	no data
Far Cry 5	84	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	77	no data
Forza Horizon 4	90	no data
Hitman 3	55−60	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120	no data
Metro Exodus	90−95	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	58	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55	no data
Battlefield 5	74	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50	no data
Far Cry 5	69	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	64	no data
Forza Horizon 4	230	no data
Hitman 3	55−60	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120	no data
Metro Exodus	90−95	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50	no data
Far Cry 5	50	no data
Forza Horizon 4	59	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	47	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22	no data
Far Cry 5	48	no data
Forza Horizon 4	48	no data
Hitman 3	35−40	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65	no data
Metro Exodus	55−60	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	22	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	24	no data
Hitman 3	21−24	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	29	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9	no data
Far Cry 5	16	no data
Forza Horizon 4	34	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35	no data
Metro Exodus	27−30	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14	no data