ATI Radeon 9600 XT vs GeForce GTX 980

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 and Radeon 9600 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 980
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 165 Watt
26.46
+32975%

GTX 980 outperforms ATI 9600 XT by a whopping 32975% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2331501
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.35no data
Power efficiency12.220.28
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGM204RV360
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 October 2003 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1064 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1216 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt22 Watt
Texture fill rate155.62.000
Floating-point processing power4.981 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1284

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s300 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s9.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.21x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 980 26.46
+32975%
ATI 9600 XT 0.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980 11090
+31586%
ATI 9600 XT 35

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93-0−1
1440p51-0−1
4K39-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.90no data
1440p10.76no data
4K14.08no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 150−160 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 0−1
Sons of the Forest 55−60 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 109 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 150−160 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 0−1
Far Cry 5 80 0−1
Fortnite 242 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 90 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 85−90 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 93 0−1
Sons of the Forest 55−60 0−1
Valorant 170−180 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 150−160 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 0−1
Dota 2 120−130 0−1
Far Cry 5 73 0−1
Fortnite 116 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 83 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 85−90 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 72 0−1
Metro Exodus 60−65 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 79 0−1
Sons of the Forest 55−60 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85 0−1
Valorant 170−180 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 82 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 0−1
Dota 2 120−130 0−1
Far Cry 5 69 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 59 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 56 0−1
Sons of the Forest 55−60 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46 0−1
Valorant 170−180 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 91 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55 0−1
Metro Exodus 35−40 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Valorant 210−220 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 62 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 0−1
Far Cry 5 48 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 48 0−1
Sons of the Forest 35−40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 53 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 59 0−1
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 0−1
Valorant 160−170 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 32 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Dota 2 85−90 0−1
Far Cry 5 24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 34 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20 0−1
Sons of the Forest 21−24 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.46 0.08
Recency 19 September 2014 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 22 Watt

GTX 980 has a 32975% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9600 XT, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 980 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 XT in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
GeForce GTX 980
ATI Radeon 9600 XT
Radeon 9600 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1619 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 50 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980 or Radeon 9600 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.