Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce GTX 980

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 165 Watt
28.77
+5.5%

GTX 980 outperforms Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking191198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.87no data
Power efficiency12.4555.63
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM204AD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date19 September 2014 (10 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed1064 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1216 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate155.6129.6
Floating-point processing power4.981 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs12864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2Portable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 28.77
+5.5%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.26

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 980 17605
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+15%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 980 37997
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+74.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 980 12938
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+9.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD91
+7.1%
85−90
−7.1%
1440p47
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
4K38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 69
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Battlefield 5 86
+7.5%
80−85
−7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 84
+12%
75−80
−12%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
+10%
70−75
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 253
+10%
230−240
−10%
Hitman 3 55−60
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+7.5%
120−130
−7.5%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+8.9%
90−95
−8.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+12.3%
65−70
−12.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
+8.3%
120−130
−8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+11%
100−105
−11%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 83
+10.7%
75−80
−10.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Battlefield 5 74
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 69
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 64
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 230
+9.5%
210−220
−9.5%
Hitman 3 55−60
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+7.5%
120−130
−7.5%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+8.9%
90−95
−8.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+12.3%
65−70
−12.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+11.1%
90−95
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+10%
120−130
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+11%
100−105
−11%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 50
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Hitman 3 55−60
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+7.5%
120−130
−7.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+11.1%
90−95
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+15%
40−45
−15%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+11%
100−105
−11%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+12.3%
65−70
−12.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 44
+10%
40−45
−10%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 33
+10%
30−33
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 147
+13.1%
130−140
−13.1%
Hitman 3 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+12.1%
140−150
−12.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Hitman 3 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+11.5%
130−140
−11.5%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 34
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%

This is how GTX 980 and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 is 7% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 is 18% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980 is 9% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.77 27.26
Recency 19 September 2014 26 February 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 980 has a 5.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 371.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 980 and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 is a desktop card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
GeForce GTX 980
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1394 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 13 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.