ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 vs GeForce GTX 980

Place in the ranking	193	866
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.89	no data
Power efficiency	12.16	no data
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	GM204	M98
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	19 September 2014 (10 years ago)	9 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	800
Core clock speed	1064 MHz	550 MHz
Boost clock speed	1216 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,200 million	956 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	155.6	22.00
Floating-point processing power	4.981 TFLOPS	0.88 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	16
TMUs	128	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Recommended system power (PSU)	500 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	888 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224 GB/s	56.83 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
VGA аnalog display support	+	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	+	-
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
BatteryBoost	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	6.4	4.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 28.79
+1258%

ATI Mobility HD 4870 2.12

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 980 37997
+473%

ATI Mobility HD 4870 6631

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	91 +225%	28 −225%
1440p	50 +1567%	3−4 −1567%
4K	39 +1850%	2−3 −1850%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	6.03	no data
1440p	10.98	no data
4K	14.08	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

45−50
+860%

5−6

−860%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	69 +886%	7−8 −886%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +1533%	3−4 −1533%
Battlefield 5	86 +4200%	2−3 −4200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +1080%	5−6 −1080%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +860%	5−6 −860%
Far Cry 5	84 +2700%	3−4 −2700%
Far Cry New Dawn	77 +1440%	5−6 −1440%
Forza Horizon 4	253 +2711%	9−10 −2711%
Hitman 3	55−60 +743%	7−8 −743%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +617%	18−20 −617%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +1300%	7−8 −1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +1725%	4−5 −1725%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130 +1200%	10−11 −1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +208%	35−40 −208%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	83 +1086%	7−8 −1086%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +1533%	3−4 −1533%
Battlefield 5	74 +3600%	2−3 −3600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +1080%	5−6 −1080%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +860%	5−6 −860%
Far Cry 5	69 +2200%	3−4 −2200%
Far Cry New Dawn	64 +1180%	5−6 −1180%
Forza Horizon 4	230 +2456%	9−10 −2456%
Hitman 3	55−60 +743%	7−8 −743%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +617%	18−20 −617%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +1300%	7−8 −1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +1725%	4−5 −1725%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +900%	10−11 −900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	132 +1000%	12−14 −1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +208%	35−40 −208%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35 +400%	7−8 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +1533%	3−4 −1533%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +1080%	5−6 −1080%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +860%	5−6 −860%
Far Cry 5	50 +1567%	3−4 −1567%
Forza Horizon 4	59 +556%	9−10 −556%
Hitman 3	55−60 +743%	7−8 −743%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +617%	18−20 −617%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +900%	10−11 −900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46 +283%	12−14 −283%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +208%	35−40 −208%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

70−75
+1725%

4−5

−1725%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	47 +1467%	3−4 −1467%
Far Cry New Dawn	44 +1367%	3−4 −1367%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 +1250%	2−3 −1250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +1350%	2−3 −1350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +3200%	1−2 −3200%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
Far Cry 5	33 +1550%	2−3 −1550%
Forza Horizon 4	147 +1370%	10−11 −1370%
Hitman 3	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +900%	6−7 −900%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +1275%	4−5 −1275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +1525%	4−5 −1525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +3600%	1−2 −3600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +1208%	12−14 −1208%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
+880%

5−6

−880%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	22 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Far Cry New Dawn	24 +2300%	1−2 −2300%
Hitman 3	21−24 +2200%	1−2 −2200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +1350%	10−11 −1350%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +1600%	2−3 −1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	29 +1350%	2−3 −1350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14 +600%	2−3 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9	0−1
Far Cry 5	16 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Forza Horizon 4	34 +1600%	2−3 −1600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +1750%	2−3 −1750%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+733%

3−4

−733%

This is how GTX 980 and ATI Mobility HD 4870 compete in popular games:

GTX 980 is 225% faster in 1080p
GTX 980 is 1567% faster in 1440p
GTX 980 is 1850% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 980 is 4200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GTX 980 surpassed ATI Mobility HD 4870 in all 54 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	28.79	2.12
Recency	19 September 2014	9 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	55 nm

GTX 980 has a 1258% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 980 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 is a desktop card while Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.