ATI Radeon 7000 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1781600
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.40no data
Power efficiency10.06no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGM200RV100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 June 2015 (10 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,000 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate189.40.55
Floating-point processing power6.06 TFLOPSno data
ROPs961
TMUs1763
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB32 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s183 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.21x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.51.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.4N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980 Ti 13701
+684950%
Samples: 14500
ATI 7000 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100no data
1440p49no data
4K51no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.49no data
1440p13.24no data
4K12.73no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130 no data
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 no data
Escape from Tarkov 110−120 no data
Far Cry 5 100−110 no data
Fortnite 140−150 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 no data
Valorant 200−210 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130 no data
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 no data
Dota 2 130−140 no data
Escape from Tarkov 110−120 no data
Far Cry 5 100−110 no data
Fortnite 140−150 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 34 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 no data
Metro Exodus 75−80 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120 no data
Valorant 200−210 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 94 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 no data
Dota 2 130−140 no data
Escape from Tarkov 110−120 no data
Far Cry 5 77 no data
Forza Horizon 4 72 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 72 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59 no data
Valorant 200−210 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 88 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 45−50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 230−240 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Escape from Tarkov 75−80 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 79 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 30−33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44 no data
Valorant 200−210 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 132 no data
Escape from Tarkov 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 42 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 32 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2015 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 980 Ti has an age advantage of 14 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7000, on the other hand, has 987% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1799 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 200 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980 Ti or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.