GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs GTX 980 Ti

Place in the ranking	135	134
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	14.28	no data
Power efficiency	9.91	30.98
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GM200	TU104
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	2 June 2015 (9 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$649	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2816	3072
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	1075 MHz	1080 MHz
Number of transistors	8,000 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	189.4	207.4
Floating-point processing power	6.06 TFLOPS	6.636 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	64
TMUs	176	192
Tensor Cores	no data	384
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.5 GB/s	352.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	+	+
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
VR Ready	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.140
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Ti 35.79

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 35.82
+0.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980 Ti 13808

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 13816
+0.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 980 Ti 23057

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 29637
+28.5%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 980 Ti 48631

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 60306
+24%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 980 Ti 16961

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 21903
+29.1%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 980 Ti 98958

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 127741
+29.1%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 980 Ti 443119

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 468363
+5.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100 −10%	110 +10%
1440p	47 −51.1%	71 +51.1%
4K	52 +15.6%	45 −15.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	6.49	no data
1440p	13.81	no data
4K	12.48	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

+0%

60−65

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −18.4%	90 +18.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −31.5%	96 +31.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −50.6%	119 +50.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 −68.9%	152 +68.9%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −0.5%	180−190 +0.5%
Hitman 3	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −0.7%	150−160 +0.7%
Metro Exodus	110−120 −66.7%	195 +66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 −16.3%	100 +16.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −1.3%	75−80 +1.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Battlefield 5	47 −147%	110−120 +147%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −20.5%	88 +20.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −26.6%	100 +26.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	36 −203%	109 +203%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −0.5%	180−190 +0.5%
Hitman 3	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −0.7%	150−160 +0.7%
Metro Exodus	49 −218%	156 +218%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +1.2%	85 −1.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	155 +109%	70−75 −109%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	46 −21.7%	56 +21.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +10.6%	66 −10.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +9.7%	72 −9.7%
Forza Horizon 4	72 −154%	180−190 +154%
Hitman 3	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +28.8%	118 −28.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	59 −49.2%	88 +49.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90

−8.1%

93
+8.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −34.5%	74 +34.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −39.5%	53 +39.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −21.4%	51 +21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −36.6%	56 +36.6%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Hitman 3	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −15.6%	89 +15.6%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −11.9%	75 +11.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65

−21.3%

74
+21.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30 −20%	35−40 +20%
Far Cry New Dawn	29 −41.4%	41 +41.4%
Hitman 3	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Metro Exodus	35 −85.7%	65 +85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44 −22.7%	54 +22.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18 −77.8%	32 +77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −36.4%	30 +36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −52.4%	32 +52.4%
Forza Horizon 4	42 −16.7%	45−50 +16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−29%

40
+29%

This is how GTX 980 Ti and RTX 2080 Super Max-Q compete in popular games:

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q is 10% faster in 1080p
RTX 2080 Super Max-Q is 51% faster in 1440p
GTX 980 Ti is 16% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 980 Ti is 109% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2080 Super Max-Q is 218% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 980 Ti is ahead in 5 tests (7%)
RTX 2080 Super Max-Q is ahead in 39 tests (54%)
there's a draw in 28 tests (39%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.79	35.82
Recency	2 June 2015	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	80 Watt

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q has a 0.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 980 Ti and GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.