770 vs 980 SLI Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GTX 980 SLI Mobile
38.73
+153%

980 SLI Mobile outperforms 770 by 153% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking108320
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money76.613.51
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameN16E-GXX SLIGK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 September 2015 (8 years old)30 May 2013 (10 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399
Current price$301 $254 (0.6x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile has 2083% better value for money than GTX 770.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961536
CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed1126 MHz1046 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistors10400 Million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)330 Watt230 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data98 °C
Texture fill rateno data134 billion/sec
Floating-point performanceno data3,333 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile and GeForce GTX 770 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data10.5" (26.7 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Minimum recommended system powerno data600 Watt
Supplementary power connectorsno dataOne 8-pin and one 6-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed3500 MHz7012 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.3 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMIno data+
HDCPno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3Dno data+
3D Gamingno data+
3D Visionno data+
PhysXno data+
3D Vision Liveno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.3
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 38.73
+153%
GTX 770 15.29

980 SLI Mobile outperforms 770 by 153% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 25453
+212%
GTX 770 8150

980 SLI Mobile outperforms 770 by 212% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD136
+172%
50−55
−172%
4K64
+167%
24−27
−167%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+183%
24−27
−183%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+156%
27−30
−156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+183%
24−27
−183%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+183%
40−45
−183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+165%
40−45
−165%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+183%
24−27
−183%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+180%
35−40
−180%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+166%
35−40
−166%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+164%
45−50
−164%
Hitman 3 120−130
+173%
45−50
−173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+180%
30−33
−180%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+158%
24−27
−158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+169%
35−40
−169%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+167%
27−30
−167%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+156%
27−30
−156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+183%
24−27
−183%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+183%
40−45
−183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+165%
40−45
−165%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+183%
24−27
−183%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+180%
35−40
−180%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+166%
35−40
−166%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+164%
45−50
−164%
Hitman 3 120−130
+173%
45−50
−173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+180%
30−33
−180%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+156%
27−30
−156%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+158%
24−27
−158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+169%
35−40
−169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+164%
50−55
−164%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+167%
27−30
−167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+156%
27−30
−156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+183%
24−27
−183%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+183%
40−45
−183%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+183%
24−27
−183%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+180%
35−40
−180%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+166%
35−40
−166%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+164%
45−50
−164%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+174%
27−30
−174%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+167%
27−30
−167%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
Hitman 3 70−75
+167%
27−30
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+163%
27−30
−163%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+170%
27−30
−170%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+173%
30−33
−173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+167%
21−24
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Hitman 3 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+183%
18−20
−183%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+156%
16−18
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%

This is how GTX 980 SLI Mobile and GTX 770 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 172% faster than GTX 770

4K resolution:

  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 167% faster than GTX 770

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 38.73 15.29
Recency 22 September 2015 30 May 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 330 Watt 230 Watt

The GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
GeForce GTX 770

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 65 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1380 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.