GeForce G 105M vs GTX 980 SLI Mobile

Place in the ranking	114	1416
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.16	0.78
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code name	N16E-GXX SLI	N10M-GE1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	22 September 2015 (9 years ago)	8 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	8
Core clock speed	1126 MHz	640 MHz
Boost clock speed	1228 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	10400 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	330 Watt	14 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2x 8 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	3500 MHz	700 MHz
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

G-SYNC support

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	10
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 39.29
+24456%

G 105M 0.16

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 47704
+5954%

G 105M 788

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	133	0−1
4K	63	-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

65−70
+3300%

2−3

−3300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +2633%	3−4 −2633%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70	0−1
Battlefield 5	120−130	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +3800%	2−3 −3800%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +3300%	2−3 −3300%
Far Cry 5	80−85	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	190−200	0−1
Hitman 3	80−85 +1950%	4−5 −1950%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +1925%	8−9 −1925%
Metro Exodus	120−130	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +3425%	4−5 −3425%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +357%	27−30 −357%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +2633%	3−4 −2633%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70	0−1
Battlefield 5	120−130	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +3800%	2−3 −3800%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +3300%	2−3 −3300%
Far Cry 5	80−85	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	190−200	0−1
Hitman 3	80−85 +1950%	4−5 −1950%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +1925%	8−9 −1925%
Metro Exodus	120−130	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +3425%	4−5 −3425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	137 +1422%	9−10 −1422%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +357%	27−30 −357%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +2633%	3−4 −2633%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +3800%	2−3 −3800%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +3300%	2−3 −3300%
Far Cry 5	80−85	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	190−200	0−1
Hitman 3	80−85 +1950%	4−5 −1950%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +1925%	8−9 −1925%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +3425%	4−5 −3425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 +722%	9−10 −722%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +357%	27−30 −357%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33	0−1
Far Cry 5	45−50	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	210−220	0−1
Hitman 3	50−55 +733%	6−7 −733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +4100%	2−3 −4100%
Metro Exodus	70−75	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	190−200	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70
+3200%

2−3

−3200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35	0−1
Hitman 3	30−35	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190	0−1
Metro Exodus	45−50	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14	0−1
Far Cry 5	21−24	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20	0−1