ATI Radeon X1050 vs GeForce GTX 970M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 970M with Radeon X1050, including specs and performance data.

GTX 970M
2014
3 GB GDDR5
14.66
+11177%

GTX 970M outperforms ATI X1050 by a whopping 11177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3621446
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.620.38
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGM204RV370
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 October 2014 (10 years ago)7 December 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,560.89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed924 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown24 Watt
Texture fill rate83.041.600
Floating-point processing power2.657 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs804

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB128 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz333 MHz
Memory bandwidth120 GB/s5.328 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 970M 14.66
+11177%
ATI X1050 0.13

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 970M 5710
+11553%
ATI X1050 49

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p136
+13500%
1−2
−13500%
Full HD580−1
1440p27-0−1
4K21-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p44.15no data
1440p94.85no data
4K121.95no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40 0−1
Battlefield 5 66 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 0−1
Far Cry 5 46 0−1
Fortnite 163
+16200%
1−2
−16200%
Forza Horizon 4 61 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60 0−1
Valorant 110−120
+11600%
1−2
−11600%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40 0−1
Battlefield 5 54 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+18900%
1−2
−18900%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 0−1
Dota 2 85−90 0−1
Far Cry 5 43 0−1
Fortnite 65 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 53 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 49 0−1
Metro Exodus 24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 49 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45 0−1
Valorant 110−120
+11600%
1−2
−11600%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 49 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 0−1
Dota 2 85−90 0−1
Far Cry 5 39 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 36 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 33 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26 0−1
Valorant 110−120
+11600%
1−2
−11600%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 49 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 0−1
Metro Exodus 14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+12800%
1−2
−12800%
Valorant 140−150
+14400%
1−2
−14400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 33 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 23 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 31 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 33 0−1
Metro Exodus 7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 0−1
Valorant 75−80 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 15 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 50−55 0−1
Far Cry 5 13 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14 0−1

This is how GTX 970M and ATI X1050 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 970M is 13500% faster in 900p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.66 0.13
Recency 7 October 2014 7 December 2006
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

GTX 970M has a 11176.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 970M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1050 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970M is a notebook card while Radeon X1050 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GeForce GTX 970M
ATI Radeon X1050
Radeon X1050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 317 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 20 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 970M or Radeon X1050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.