Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs GeForce GTX 970M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 970M with Radeon Pro Vega 64X, including specs and performance data.

GTX 970M
2014
3 GB GDDR5
14.83

Pro Vega 64X outperforms GTX 970M by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking355140
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.749.89
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 October 2014 (10 years ago)19 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,560.89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12804096
Core clock speed924 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown250 Watt
Texture fill rate83.04375.8
Floating-point processing power2.657 TFLOPS12.03 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs80256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth120 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.125
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 970M 14.83
Pro Vega 64X 35.53
+140%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 970M 5721
Pro Vega 64X 13708
+140%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 970M 19027
Pro Vega 64X 75438
+296%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p136
−121%
300−350
+121%
Full HD56
−132%
130−140
+132%
1440p27
−122%
60−65
+122%
4K21
−138%
50−55
+138%

Cost per frame, $

1080p45.73no data
1440p94.85no data
4K121.95no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 42
−138%
100−105
+138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Battlefield 5 52
−131%
120−130
+131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Far Cry 5 50
−120%
110−120
+120%
Far Cry New Dawn 48
−129%
110−120
+129%
Forza Horizon 4 144
−108%
300−310
+108%
Hitman 3 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−137%
180−190
+137%
Metro Exodus 53
−126%
120−130
+126%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 81
−135%
190−200
+135%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−131%
180−190
+131%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
−126%
120−130
+126%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Battlefield 5 44
−127%
100−105
+127%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Far Cry 5 41
−132%
95−100
+132%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
−130%
85−90
+130%
Forza Horizon 4 131
−129%
300−310
+129%
Hitman 3 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−137%
180−190
+137%
Metro Exodus 44
−127%
100−105
+127%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−129%
110−120
+129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
−138%
240−250
+138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−131%
180−190
+131%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
−138%
50−55
+138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Far Cry 5 29
−124%
65−70
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 36
−136%
85−90
+136%
Hitman 3 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−137%
180−190
+137%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−129%
110−120
+129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−131%
60−65
+131%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−131%
180−190
+131%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 26
−131%
60−65
+131%
Far Cry New Dawn 25
−120%
55−60
+120%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
−135%
40−45
+135%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Far Cry 5 19
−137%
45−50
+137%
Forza Horizon 4 80
−138%
190−200
+138%
Hitman 3 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Metro Exodus 25
−120%
55−60
+120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−122%
60−65
+122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
−131%
210−220
+131%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12
−125%
27−30
+125%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
−131%
30−33
+131%
Hitman 3 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−130%
170−180
+130%
Metro Exodus 14
−114%
30−33
+114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−119%
35−40
+119%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 8
−125%
18−20
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 6
−133%
14−16
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%

This is how GTX 970M and Pro Vega 64X compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega 64X is 121% faster in 900p
  • Pro Vega 64X is 132% faster in 1080p
  • Pro Vega 64X is 122% faster in 1440p
  • Pro Vega 64X is 138% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.83 35.53
Recency 7 October 2014 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Pro Vega 64X has a 139.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 970M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GeForce GTX 970M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 308 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.