GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB vs GTX 970M

Aggregated performance score

GTX 970M
2014
6 GB GDDR5
14.80

RTX 3060 8 GB outperforms GTX 970M by a whopping 169% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking331100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.9832.51
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGM204GA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 October 2014 (9 years ago)12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,560.89 no data
Current price$848 (0.3x MSRP)$384

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3060 8 GB has 717% better value for money than GTX 970M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12803584
CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed924 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1777 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown170 Watt
Texture fill rate83.04199.0
Floating-point performance2,657 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 970M and GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz15 GB/s
Memory bandwidth120 GB/s240.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 970M 14.80
RTX 3060 8 GB 39.75
+169%

RTX 3060 8 GB outperforms GTX 970M by 169% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 970M 5727
RTX 3060 8 GB 15383
+169%

RTX 3060 8 GB outperforms GTX 970M by 169% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p136
−157%
350−400
+157%
Full HD58
−159%
150−160
+159%
1440p27
−159%
70−75
+159%
4K21
−162%
55−60
+162%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 42
−162%
110−120
+162%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−160%
65−70
+160%
Battlefield 5 66
−158%
170−180
+158%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−163%
100−105
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Far Cry 5 46
−161%
120−130
+161%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
−168%
110−120
+168%
Forza Horizon 4 61
−162%
160−170
+162%
Hitman 3 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−158%
80−85
+158%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−160%
65−70
+160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
−150%
100−105
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−168%
75−80
+168%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36
−164%
95−100
+164%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−160%
65−70
+160%
Battlefield 5 54
−159%
140−150
+159%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−163%
100−105
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Far Cry 5 43
−156%
110−120
+156%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−163%
100−105
+163%
Forza Horizon 4 53
−164%
140−150
+164%
Hitman 3 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−158%
80−85
+158%
Metro Exodus 24
−150%
60−65
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−160%
65−70
+160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34
−165%
90−95
+165%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
−167%
120−130
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−168%
75−80
+168%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
−162%
55−60
+162%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−160%
65−70
+160%
Battlefield 5 49
−165%
130−140
+165%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Far Cry 5 39
−156%
100−105
+156%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
−157%
90−95
+157%
Forza Horizon 4 36
−164%
95−100
+164%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−150%
65−70
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−168%
75−80
+168%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Hitman 3 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Metro Exodus 14
−150%
35−40
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20
−150%
50−55
+150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
−165%
45−50
+165%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Battlefield 5 33
−158%
85−90
+158%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Far Cry 5 27
−159%
70−75
+159%
Far Cry New Dawn 25
−160%
65−70
+160%
Forza Horizon 4 23
−161%
60−65
+161%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Hitman 3 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Metro Exodus 7
−157%
18−20
+157%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
−167%
24−27
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−150%
40−45
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Battlefield 5 15
−167%
40−45
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry 5 13
−131%
30−33
+131%
Far Cry New Dawn 12
−150%
30−33
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 6
−167%
16−18
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

This is how GTX 970M and RTX 3060 8 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 8 GB is 157% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3060 8 GB is 159% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 8 GB is 159% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 8 GB is 162% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.80 39.75
Recency 7 October 2014 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

The GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 970M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GeForce GTX 970M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 290 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 535 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.