GeForce 9800M GTX SLI vs GTX 970M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 970M SLI and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 970M SLI outperforms 9800M GTX SLI by a whopping 689% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 240 | 779 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 10.23 | 1.40 |
| Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2017) | G9x (2007−2010) |
| GPU code name | no data | NB9E-GTX |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 October 2014 (10 years ago) | 15 July 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 224 |
| Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2x 5200 Million | 3016 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 162 Watt | 150 Watt |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | large |
| SLI options | + | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2x 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 10 |
| CUDA | + | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 88
+780%
| 10−12
−780%
|
| 4K | 41
+720%
| 5−6
−720%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 60−65
+786%
|
7−8
−786%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 130−140
+1550%
|
8−9
−1550%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+717%
|
6−7
−717%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 60−65
+786%
|
7−8
−786%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+810%
|
10−11
−810%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 130−140
+1550%
|
8−9
−1550%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+717%
|
6−7
−717%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 75−80
+1183%
|
6−7
−1183%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120
+667%
|
14−16
−667%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+550%
|
14−16
−550%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 70−75
+1360%
|
5−6
−1360%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
+585%
|
12−14
−585%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+248%
|
45−50
−248%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 60−65
+786%
|
7−8
−786%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+810%
|
10−11
−810%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 130−140
+1550%
|
8−9
−1550%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 250−260
+365%
|
50−55
−365%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+717%
|
6−7
−717%
|
| Dota 2 | 110−120
+325%
|
27−30
−325%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 75−80
+1183%
|
6−7
−1183%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120
+667%
|
14−16
−667%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+550%
|
14−16
−550%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 70−75
+1360%
|
5−6
−1360%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 80−85
+950%
|
8−9
−950%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55
+900%
|
5−6
−900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
+585%
|
12−14
−585%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 85
+844%
|
9−10
−844%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+248%
|
45−50
−248%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+810%
|
10−11
−810%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+717%
|
6−7
−717%
|
| Dota 2 | 110−120
+325%
|
27−30
−325%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 75−80
+1183%
|
6−7
−1183%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+550%
|
14−16
−550%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
+585%
|
12−14
−585%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 48
+433%
|
9−10
−433%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+248%
|
45−50
−248%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 110−120
+667%
|
14−16
−667%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+1567%
|
3−4
−1567%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 160−170
+671%
|
21−24
−671%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 40−45
+1950%
|
2−3
−1950%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−33
+2900%
|
1−2
−2900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+596%
|
24−27
−596%
|
| Valorant | 190−200
+611%
|
27−30
−611%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+700%
|
8−9
−700%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+940%
|
5−6
−940%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+743%
|
7−8
−743%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+875%
|
4−5
−875%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 50−55
+980%
|
5−6
−980%
|
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 40−45
+163%
|
16−18
−163%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 28
+833%
|
3−4
−833%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+787%
|
14−16
−787%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+775%
|
4−5
−775%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Dota 2 | 75−80
+850%
|
8−9
−850%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+767%
|
3−4
−767%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1900%
|
2−3
−1900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
+500%
|
4−5
−500%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 24−27
+525%
|
4−5
−525%
|
This is how GTX 970M SLI and 9800M GTX SLI compete in popular games:
- GTX 970M SLI is 780% faster in 1080p
- GTX 970M SLI is 720% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 970M SLI is 2900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 970M SLI surpassed 9800M GTX SLI in all 57 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 20.99 | 2.66 |
| Recency | 7 October 2014 | 15 July 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 162 Watt | 150 Watt |
GTX 970M SLI has a 689.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.
9800M GTX SLI, on the other hand, has 8% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
