UHD Graphics 610 vs GeForce GTX 970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 970 with UHD Graphics 610, including specs and performance data.

GTX 970
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 148 Watt
24.92
+1226%

GTX 970 outperforms UHD Graphics 610 by a whopping 1226% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking224918
Place by popularity60not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.80no data
Power efficiency11.628.65
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Coffee Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 September 2014 (10 years ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores166496
Core clock speed1050 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)148 Watt15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate122.510.80
Floating-point processing power3.92 TFLOPS0.1728 TFLOPS
ROPs562
TMUs10412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2Portable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 970 24.92
+1226%
UHD Graphics 610 1.88

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 970 9634
+1223%
UHD Graphics 610 728

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 970 16033
+1638%
UHD Graphics 610 923

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 970 42263
+958%
UHD Graphics 610 3996

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 970 11954
+1702%
UHD Graphics 610 664

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 970 72819
+1280%
UHD Graphics 610 5277

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 970 422295
+889%
UHD Graphics 610 42713

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD81
+913%
8
−913%
1440p54
+1250%
4−5
−1250%
4K38
+1800%
2−3
−1800%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.06no data
1440p6.09no data
4K8.66no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+475%
8−9
−475%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+1175%
4−5
−1175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+2225%
4−5
−2225%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+475%
8−9
−475%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+1175%
4−5
−1175%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+1875%
4
−1875%
Fortnite 110−120
+1571%
7−8
−1571%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+944%
9−10
−944%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+810%
10−11
−810%
Valorant 160−170
+329%
35−40
−329%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+2225%
4−5
−2225%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+475%
8−9
−475%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+586%
35−40
−586%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+1175%
4−5
−1175%
Dota 2 120−130
+908%
12
−908%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+2533%
3
−2533%
Fortnite 82
+1071%
7−8
−1071%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+944%
9−10
−944%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+2267%
3
−2267%
Metro Exodus 39
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+810%
10−11
−810%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+1925%
4
−1925%
Valorant 160−170
+329%
35−40
−329%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 48
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+475%
8−9
−475%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+1175%
4−5
−1175%
Dota 2 120−130
+1000%
11
−1000%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+7800%
1−2
−7800%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+944%
9−10
−944%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 52
+420%
10−11
−420%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+514%
7−8
−514%
Valorant 160−170
+329%
35−40
−329%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60
+757%
7−8
−757%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+1283%
12−14
−1283%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Metro Exodus 24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1358%
12−14
−1358%
Valorant 200−210
+1583%
12−14
−1583%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+1550%
4−5
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+4100%
1−2
−4100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+1767%
3−4
−1767%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 46
+207%
14−16
−207%
Metro Exodus 13 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Valorant 130−140
+1422%
9−10
−1422%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 75−80
+2467%
3−4
−2467%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18
+500%
3−4
−500%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 22
+633%
3−4
−633%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTX 970 and UHD Graphics 610 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 970 is 913% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 970 is 1250% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 970 is 1800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 970 is 7800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 970 is ahead in 55 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.92 1.88
Recency 19 September 2014 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 148 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 970 has a 1225.5% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 610, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 886.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 970 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 610 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 610 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970
Intel UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 610

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 4974 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 661 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 970 or UHD Graphics 610, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.