Radeon RX Vega M GL vs GeForce GTX 970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 970
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 145 Watt
24.97
+166%

GeForce GTX 970 outperforms Radeon RX Vega M GL by a whopping 166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking200439
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.662.54
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Polaris 22
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 September 2014 (9 years ago)1 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data
Current price$105 (0.3x MSRP)$1307

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 970 has 831% better value for money than RX Vega M GL.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16641280
CUDA cores1664no data
Core clock speed1050 MHz931 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHz1011 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate109 billion/sec80.88
Floating-point performance3,920 gflops2,588 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 970 and Radeon RX Vega M GL compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinsno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s179.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 970 24.97
+166%
RX Vega M GL 9.40

GeForce GTX 970 outperforms Radeon RX Vega M GL by 166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 970 9644
+166%
RX Vega M GL 3631

GeForce GTX 970 outperforms Radeon RX Vega M GL by 166% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD83
+177%
30−35
−177%
1440p59
+181%
21−24
−181%
4K40
+186%
14−16
−186%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+144%
40−45
−144%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
+150%
45−50
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 110−120
+156%
40−45
−156%
Battlefield 5 210−220
+156%
80−85
−156%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 130−140
+155%
50−55
−155%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+144%
40−45
−144%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+163%
55−60
−163%
Far Cry New Dawn 170−180
+162%
65−70
−162%
Forza Horizon 4 280−290
+159%
100−110
−159%
Hitman 3 130−140
+160%
50−55
−160%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+163%
95−100
−163%
Metro Exodus 210−220
+159%
80−85
−159%
Red Dead Redemption 2 170−180
+158%
65−70
−158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230
+156%
85−90
−156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+154%
70−75
−154%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
+150%
45−50
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 110−120
+156%
40−45
−156%
Battlefield 5 210−220
+156%
80−85
−156%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 130−140
+150%
52
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+144%
40−45
−144%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+163%
55−60
−163%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+159%
29
−159%
Forza Horizon 4 280−290
+159%
100−110
−159%
Hitman 3 130−140
+160%
50−55
−160%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+163%
95−100
−163%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+157%
35
−157%
Red Dead Redemption 2 170−180
+158%
65−70
−158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230
+156%
85−90
−156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+163%
18−20
−163%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+154%
70−75
−154%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
+150%
45−50
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 110−120
+156%
40−45
−156%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+164%
36
−164%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+144%
40−45
−144%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+163%
55−60
−163%
Forza Horizon 4 280−290
+159%
100−110
−159%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+163%
95−100
−163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230
+156%
85−90
−156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+163%
18−20
−163%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+154%
70−75
−154%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 170−180
+158%
65−70
−158%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+155%
45−50
−155%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+161%
46
−161%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+150%
24−27
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+160%
24−27
−160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+165%
30−35
−165%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+156%
40−45
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+160%
50−55
−160%
Hitman 3 75−80
+150%
30−33
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+150%
50−55
−150%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+155%
45−50
−155%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+155%
55−60
−155%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+158%
30−35
−158%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+163%
18−20
−163%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+162%
40−45
−162%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+160%
24−27
−160%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+150%
20
−150%
Hitman 3 50−55
+150%
20−22
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+159%
27−30
−159%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+165%
16−18
−165%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+133%
14−16
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+165%
30−35
−165%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+159%
27−30
−159%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+145%
10−12
−145%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+150%
21−24
−150%

This is how GTX 970 and RX Vega M GL compete in popular games:

  • GTX 970 is 177% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 970 is 181% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 970 is 186% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.97 9.40
Recency 19 September 2014 1 February 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 65 Watt

The GeForce GTX 970 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970 is a desktop card while Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 4374 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.