GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs 970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 970 with GeForce GTX 460M SLI, including specs and performance data.

GTX 970
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 145 Watt
24.97
+405%

970 outperforms 460M SLI by a whopping 405% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking200601
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.742.42
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM204N11E-GS
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 September 2014 (9 years ago)3 September 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data
Current price$105 (0.3x MSRP)$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 970 has 881% better value for money than GTX 460M SLI.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1664384
CUDA cores1664no data
Core clock speed1050 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)145 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate109 billion/secno data
Floating-point performance3,920 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 970 and GeForce GTX 460M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinsno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x1536 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2no data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126no data
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 970 24.97
+405%
GTX 460M SLI 4.94

970 outperforms 460M SLI by 405% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 970 16033
+384%
GTX 460M SLI 3313

970 outperforms 460M SLI by 384% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 970 42263
+197%
GTX 460M SLI 14236

970 outperforms 460M SLI by 197% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p260−270
+400%
52
−400%
Full HD83
+33.9%
62
−33.9%
1440p59
+490%
10−12
−490%
4K40
+471%
7−8
−471%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+400%
12−14
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+400%
10−12
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+400%
10−12
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+400%
14−16
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+378%
21−24
−378%
Hitman 3 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+380%
24−27
−380%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+400%
12−14
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+400%
16−18
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+400%
21−24
−400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+400%
12−14
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+400%
10−12
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+400%
10−12
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+400%
14−16
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+378%
21−24
−378%
Hitman 3 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+380%
24−27
−380%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+400%
12−14
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+400%
16−18
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+400%
10−12
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+400%
21−24
−400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+400%
10−12
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+400%
10−12
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+378%
21−24
−378%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+380%
24−27
−380%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+400%
16−18
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+400%
10−12
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+400%
21−24
−400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+400%
12−14
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+380%
24−27
−380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Hitman 3 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+400%
10−12
−400%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 270−280
+391%
55−60
−391%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Hitman 3 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%

This is how GTX 970 and GTX 460M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 970 is 400% faster in 900p
  • GTX 970 is 34% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 970 is 490% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 970 is 471% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.97 4.94
Recency 19 September 2014 3 September 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

The GeForce GTX 970 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 460M SLI is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI
GeForce GTX 460M SLI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 4398 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 460M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.