GeForce 800M vs GTX 970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 970
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 145 Watt
24.97
+2016%

GTX 970 outperforms 800M by a whopping 2016% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking2001025
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.660.02
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM204GF117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 September 2014 (9 years ago)17 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data
Current price$105 (0.3x MSRP)$8.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 970 has 118200% better value for money than GeForce 800M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores166448
CUDA cores1664no data
Core clock speed1050 MHz738 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate109 billion/sec5.904
Floating-point performance3,920 gflops141.7 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinsno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.02.0
GameWorks+no data
Optimusno data+
GameWorksno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.44.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 970 24.97
+2016%
GeForce 800M 1.18

GTX 970 outperforms 800M by 2016% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 970 9644
+2010%
GeForce 800M 457

GTX 970 outperforms 800M by 2010% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 970 26897
+1964%
GeForce 800M 1303

GTX 970 outperforms 800M by 1964% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD83
+2667%
3−4
−2667%
1440p59
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
4K40
+3900%
1−2
−3900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 850−900
+1973%
40−45
−1973%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1000−1050
+1983%
45−50
−1983%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 900−950
+1993%
40−45
−1993%
Battlefield 5 1700−1750
+1973%
80−85
−1973%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1050−1100
+1959%
50−55
−1959%
Cyberpunk 2077 850−900
+1973%
40−45
−1973%
Far Cry 5 1200−1250
+2005%
55−60
−2005%
Far Cry New Dawn 1350−1400
+1977%
65−70
−1977%
Forza Horizon 4 2250−2300
+1983%
100−110
−1983%
Hitman 3 1050−1100
+2000%
50−55
−2000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2050−2100
+1971%
95−100
−1971%
Metro Exodus 1700−1750
+1999%
80−85
−1999%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1350−1400
+1945%
65−70
−1945%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1800−1850
+1993%
85−90
−1993%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1500−1550
+2013%
70−75
−2013%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1000−1050
+1983%
45−50
−1983%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 900−950
+1993%
40−45
−1993%
Battlefield 5 1700−1750
+1973%
80−85
−1973%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1100−1150
+2015%
52
−2015%
Cyberpunk 2077 850−900
+1973%
40−45
−1973%
Far Cry 5 1200−1250
+2005%
55−60
−2005%
Far Cry New Dawn 600−650
+1969%
29
−1969%
Forza Horizon 4 2250−2300
+1983%
100−110
−1983%
Hitman 3 1050−1100
+2000%
50−55
−2000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2050−2100
+1971%
95−100
−1971%
Metro Exodus 700−750
+1900%
35
−1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1350−1400
+1945%
65−70
−1945%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1800−1850
+1993%
85−90
−1993%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1700−1750
+1999%
81
−1999%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1500−1550
+2013%
70−75
−2013%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1000−1050
+1983%
45−50
−1983%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 900−950
+1993%
40−45
−1993%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 750−800
+1983%
36
−1983%
Cyberpunk 2077 850−900
+1973%
40−45
−1973%
Far Cry 5 1200−1250
+2005%
55−60
−2005%
Forza Horizon 4 2250−2300
+1983%
100−110
−1983%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2050−2100
+1971%
95−100
−1971%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1800−1850
+1993%
85−90
−1993%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 900−950
+1993%
43
−1993%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1500−1550
+2013%
70−75
−2013%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1350−1400
+1945%
65−70
−1945%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 950−1000
+1921%
45−50
−1921%
Far Cry New Dawn 950−1000
+1965%
46
−1965%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 550−600
+2015%
24−27
−2015%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 500−550
+1900%
24−27
−1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 700−750
+1959%
30−35
−1959%
Cyberpunk 2077 300−310
+1775%
16−18
−1775%
Far Cry 5 900−950
+1993%
40−45
−1993%
Forza Horizon 4 1050−1100
+2000%
50−55
−2000%
Hitman 3 600−650
+1900%
30−33
−1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1100−1150
+2015%
50−55
−2015%
Metro Exodus 950−1000
+1921%
45−50
−1921%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1150−1200
+1991%
55−60
−1991%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 650−700
+1997%
30−35
−1997%
Watch Dogs: Legion 400−450
+2005%
18−20
−2005%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 850−900
+1924%
40−45
−1924%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 500−550
+1900%
24−27
−1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 400−450
+1900%
20
−1900%
Hitman 3 400−450
+1900%
20−22
−1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 600−650
+1969%
27−30
−1969%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+1959%
16−18
−1959%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 600−650
+1969%
29
−1969%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 300−310
+1900%
14−16
−1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 290−300
+1971%
14−16
−1971%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 290−300
+1971%
14−16
−1971%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+1900%
6−7
−1900%
Far Cry 5 290−300
+1971%
14−16
−1971%
Forza Horizon 4 700−750
+1959%
30−35
−1959%
Horizon Zero Dawn 600−650
+1969%
27−30
−1969%
Metro Exodus 500−550
+1983%
24−27
−1983%
Watch Dogs: Legion 230−240
+1991%
10−12
−1991%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 450−500
+1945%
21−24
−1945%

This is how GTX 970 and GeForce 800M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 970 is 2667% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 970 is 2850% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 970 is 3900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.97 1.18
Recency 19 September 2014 17 March 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 15 Watt

The GeForce GTX 970 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 800M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970
NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GeForce 800M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 4374 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 62 votes

Rate GeForce 800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.