ATI Radeon 7500 vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M SLI with Radeon 7500, including specs and performance data.

GTX 965M SLI
2015
2x 4 GB GDDR5
15.79
+157800%

965M SLI outperforms 7500 by a whopping 157800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3721597
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.03
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameno dataRV200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2015 (11 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed924 MHz290 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.740
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz230 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data7.36 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_17.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD72-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90−95 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 30−35 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 90−95 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55 0−1
Fortnite 85−90 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 50−55 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65 0−1
Valorant 120−130 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 90−95 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Dota 2 95−100 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55 0−1
Fortnite 85−90 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 50−55 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65 0−1
Metro Exodus 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 0−1
Valorant 120−130 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Dota 2 95−100 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 0−1
Valorant 120−130 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 0−1
Metro Exodus 20−22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 0−1
Valorant 160−170 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 35−40 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 0−1
Valorant 90−95 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 55−60 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.79 0.01
Recency 5 January 2015 14 August 2001
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

GTX 965M SLI has a 157800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 7500 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 965M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7500 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 50 votes

Rate Radeon 7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 965M SLI or Radeon 7500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.