GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition vs GTX 960M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 960M with GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.

GTX 960M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
8.79
+456%

GTX 960M outperforms GT 650M Mac Edition by a whopping 456% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking460919
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.49no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameN16P-GXGK107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 March 2015 (9 years ago)12 July 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price$799 $50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640384
CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1096 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1202 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate47.0428.80
Floating-point performance1,505 gflops691.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 960M and GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz5016 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s80.26 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p95
+494%
16−18
−494%
Full HD36
+500%
6−7
−500%
1440p14
+600%
2−3
−600%
4K14
+600%
2−3
−600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+436%
14−16
−436%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130−140
+420%
25
−420%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+433%
30
−433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+456%
18−20
−456%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+436%
14−16
−436%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+436%
28
−436%
Far Cry New Dawn 170−180
+448%
31
−448%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+443%
35
−443%
Hitman 3 90−95
+429%
16−18
−429%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+453%
35−40
−453%
Metro Exodus 170−180
+448%
31
−448%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+420%
24−27
−420%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+456%
27−30
−456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+445%
30−35
−445%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+426%
19
−426%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+422%
23
−422%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+456%
18−20
−456%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+436%
14−16
−436%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+442%
24
−442%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+422%
23
−422%
Forza Horizon 4 350−400
+393%
71
−393%
Hitman 3 90−95
+429%
16−18
−429%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+453%
35−40
−453%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+420%
25
−420%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+420%
24−27
−420%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+456%
27−30
−456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+442%
24
−442%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+445%
30−35
−445%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+445%
11
−445%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+456%
18−20
−456%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+436%
14−16
−436%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+456%
18
−456%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+420%
25
−420%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+453%
35−40
−453%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+456%
27−30
−456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+436%
14
−436%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+445%
30−35
−445%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+420%
24−27
−420%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+436%
14
−436%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+431%
16
−431%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+400%
8
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+445%
10−12
−445%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+433%
15
−433%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+456%
18
−456%
Hitman 3 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+456%
18−20
−456%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+433%
15
−433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+433%
14−16
−433%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+400%
6
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+400%
7
−400%
Hitman 3 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+456%
9−10
−456%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+450%
10
−450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+425%
4
−425%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+445%
10−12
−445%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+456%
9−10
−456%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+400%
6
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+456%
9−10
−456%

This is how GTX 960M and GT 650M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • GTX 960M is 494% faster in 900p
  • GTX 960M is 500% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 960M is 600% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 960M is 600% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.79 1.58
Recency 12 March 2015 12 July 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 45 Watt

The GeForce GTX 960M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960M is a notebook card while GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 927 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 18 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.