GeForce FX 5700 vs GTX 960A

Place in the ranking	494	1448
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	7.97	0.27
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code name	GM107	NV36
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	13 March 2015 (9 years ago)	23 October 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	no data
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	425 MHz
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	82 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.40	1.700
Floating-point processing power	1.389 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	4
TMUs	40	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	9.0a
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.5 (2.1)
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 960A 8.71
+8610%

FX 5700 0.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 960A 3355
+8288%

FX 5700 40

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.71	0.10
Recency	13 March 2015	23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	25 Watt

GTX 960A has a 8610% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5700, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 960A is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5700 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960A is a notebook card while GeForce FX 5700 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.