FirePro V7900 vs GeForce GTX 960A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 960A with FirePro V7900, including specs and performance data.

GTX 960A
2015
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
8.28
+53.3%

960A outperforms V7900 by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking553663
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.502.77
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGM107Cayman
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2015 (11 years ago)24 May 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401280
Core clock speed1029 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt151 Watt
Texture fill rate43.4058.00
Floating-point processing power1.389 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4080
L1 Cache320 KB320 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s160 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 960A 8.28
+53.3%
FirePro V7900 5.40

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 960A 3464
+53.3%
Samples: 32
FirePro V7900 2260
Samples: 80

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.28 5.40
Recency 13 March 2015 24 May 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 151 Watt

GTX 960A has a 53% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 101% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 960A is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V7900 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960A is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V7900 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 20 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 18 votes

Rate FirePro V7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 960A or FirePro V7900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.