GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GTX 880M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
670MX 675MX 675MX Mac Edition 680M 680MX Mac Edition 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 870M 880M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
745 OEM 750 750 GM206 750 Ti 750 Ti OEM 750 v2 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 760 X2 770 780 780 6 GB 780 Rev. 2 780 Ti 780 Ti 6 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 880M with GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2, including specs and performance data.

GTX 880M
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
9.14

780 Rev. 2 outperforms 880M by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 880M GTX 880M
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking513487
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.10
Power efficiency5.753.00
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK104GK110B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 March 2014 (11 years ago)10 September 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362304
Core clock speed954 MHz863 MHz
Boost clock speed993 MHz902 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate127.1173.2
Floating-point processing power3.05 TFLOPS4.156 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs128192
L1 Cache128 KB192 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB3 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 2500 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s288.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+3.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p135
−3.7%
140−150
+3.7%
Full HD58
−3.4%
60−65
+3.4%
4K23
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data10.82
4Kno data27.04

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Valorant 90−95
−4.4%
95−100
+4.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−5.6%
150−160
+5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Dota 2 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Valorant 90−95
−4.4%
95−100
+4.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Dota 2 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Valorant 90−95
−4.4%
95−100
+4.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−5.6%
75−80
+5.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
Valorant 100−110
−5.8%
110−120
+5.8%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how GTX 880M and GTX 780 Rev. 2 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780 Rev. 2 is 4% faster in 900p
  • GTX 780 Rev. 2 is 3% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 780 Rev. 2 is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.14 9.76
Recency 12 March 2014 10 September 2013
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 880M has an age advantage of 6 months, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 104.9% lower power consumption.

GTX 780 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 6.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 880M and GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 880M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GeForce GTX 880M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 880M GeForce GTX 880M
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
GTX 880M GeForce GTX 880M
vs
GTX 780M GeForce GTX 780M
R9 M395 AMD R9 M395
vs
GT 645M 645M
R9 M395 AMD R9 M395
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 4000 Blackwell
GTX 880M NVIDIA GTX 880M
vs
Iris Graphics 6100 6100
GTX 880M NVIDIA GTX 880M
vs
R7 260 260
GTX 880M NVIDIA GTX 880M
vs
HD 8470 OEM 8470 OEM
GTX 880M NVIDIA GTX 880M
vs
Quadro P600 P600
GTX 880M NVIDIA GTX 880M
vs
6600 GT Dual 6600 GT Dual
GTX 880M NVIDIA GTX 880M
vs
GT 240M LE 240M LE
GTX 880M GeForce GTX 880M
vs
GTX 460 v2 ES GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
GTX 880M NVIDIA GTX 880M
vs
GeForce MX550 MX550

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 123 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 880M or GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.