GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs 880M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
SLI
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 880M
2014
8 GB GDDR5
9.77

770M SLI outperforms 880M by 47% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking422335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.9220.99
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameN15E-GX-A2no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 March 2014 (10 years ago)30 May 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price$1544 $149

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 770M SLI has 2182% better value for money than GTX 880M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361920
CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed954 MHz811 MHz
Boost clock speed993 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million2x 2540 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate127.1no data
Floating-point performance3,050 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 880M and GeForce GTX 770M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options++

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2x 3 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width256 Bit2x 192 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 2500 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP content protection+no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
Vulkan1.1.126no data
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 880M 9.77
GTX 770M SLI 14.34
+46.8%

770M SLI outperforms 880M by 47% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 880M 8578
GTX 770M SLI 9569
+11.6%

770M SLI outperforms 880M by 12% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p135
−40.7%
190−200
+40.7%
Full HD58
−46.6%
85−90
+46.6%
4K23
−30.4%
30−35
+30.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−48.5%
45−50
+48.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−42.3%
35−40
+42.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−48%
35−40
+48%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−45.7%
50−55
+45.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
−56%
35−40
+56%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−48.5%
45−50
+48.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−42.3%
35−40
+42.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−48%
35−40
+48%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−45.7%
50−55
+45.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
−56%
35−40
+56%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−48.5%
45−50
+48.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−48%
35−40
+48%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−45.7%
50−55
+45.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Hitman 3 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−43.8%
21−24
+43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−62.5%
24−27
+62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Hitman 3 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−66.7%
20−22
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

This is how GTX 880M and GTX 770M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 770M SLI is 40.7% faster than GTX 880M in 900p
  • GTX 770M SLI is 46.6% faster than GTX 880M in 1080p
  • GTX 770M SLI is 30.4% faster than GTX 880M in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 880M is 13.3% faster than the GTX 770M SLI.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 133% faster than the GTX 880M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 880M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • GTX 770M SLI is ahead in 67 tests (99%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 9.77 14.34
Recency 12 March 2014 30 May 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 150 Watt

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 880M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GeForce GTX 880M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
GeForce GTX 770M SLI

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 105 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.