FirePro M5950 vs GeForce GTX 880M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 880M with FirePro M5950, including specs and performance data.

GTX 880M
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
9.11
+190%

GTX 880M outperforms M5950 by a whopping 190% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking497775
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.696.83
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK104Whistler
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 March 2014 (11 years ago)4 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536480
Core clock speed954 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed993 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate127.117.40
Floating-point processing power3.05 TFLOPS0.696 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs12824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0n/a
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Form factorno dataMXM-A
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 2500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s57 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 880M 9.11
+190%
FirePro M5950 3.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 880M 3817
+190%
FirePro M5950 1314

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 880M 8578
+535%
FirePro M5950 1350

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 880M 28022
+348%
FirePro M5950 6257

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 880M 14725
+1051%
FirePro M5950 1279

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p135
+463%
24
−463%
Full HD58
+123%
26
−123%
4K23
+229%
7−8
−229%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+345%
10−12
−345%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
God of War 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+273%
10−12
−273%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+345%
10−12
−345%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Fortnite 55−60
+229%
16−18
−229%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
God of War 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Valorant 90−95
+87.5%
45−50
−87.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+273%
10−12
−273%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+345%
10−12
−345%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+139%
55−60
−139%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Dota 2 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Fortnite 55−60
+229%
16−18
−229%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
God of War 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+400%
9−10
−400%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+240%
10−11
−240%
Valorant 90−95
+87.5%
45−50
−87.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+273%
10−12
−273%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Dota 2 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
God of War 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+90%
10−11
−90%
Valorant 90−95
+87.5%
45−50
−87.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+229%
16−18
−229%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+196%
24−27
−196%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+71.4%
27−30
−71.4%
Valorant 100−110
+232%
30−35
−232%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
God of War 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Valorant 45−50
+200%
16−18
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 30−35
+278%
9−10
−278%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
God of War 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

This is how GTX 880M and FirePro M5950 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 880M is 463% faster in 900p
  • GTX 880M is 123% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 880M is 229% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 880M is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 880M surpassed FirePro M5950 in all 58 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.11 3.14
Recency 12 March 2014 4 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 880M has a 190.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro M5950, on the other hand, has 248.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 880M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M5950 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 880M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M5950 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GeForce GTX 880M
AMD FirePro M5950
FirePro M5950

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 118 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 71 votes

Rate FirePro M5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 880M or FirePro M5950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.