Radeon R8 M535DX vs GeForce GTX 880M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
850A 850M 860M 860M OEM 860M SLI 870M 880M 880M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R5 M315 R7 A360 R7 M340 R7 M350 R7 M360 R7 M440 R7 M445 R7 M460 R8 M365DX R8 M445DX R8 M535DX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 880M SLI and Radeon R8 M535DX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 880M SLI
2014
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 206 Watt
19.55
+1122%

880M SLI outperforms R8 M535DX by a whopping 1122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 880M SLI GTX 880M SLI
R8 M535DX R8 M535DX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking313999
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.31no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameN15E-GX-A2Meso
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 March 2014 (12 years ago)18 April 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072320
Core clock speed954 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speedno data891 MHz
Number of transistors2x 3540 Million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)206 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data17.82
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5702 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data20
L1 Cacheno data80 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataIGP
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2x 256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5000 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD74
+1133%
6−7
−1133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+1156%
9−10
−1156%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85
+1267%
6−7
−1267%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+1156%
9−10
−1156%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Fortnite 100−110
+1200%
8−9
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1233%
6−7
−1233%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+1160%
5−6
−1160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+1167%
6−7
−1167%
Valorant 140−150
+1133%
12−14
−1133%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85
+1267%
6−7
−1267%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+1156%
9−10
−1156%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+1211%
18−20
−1211%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Dota 2 110−120
+1133%
9−10
−1133%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Fortnite 100−110
+1200%
8−9
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1233%
6−7
−1233%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+1160%
5−6
−1160%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+1133%
6−7
−1133%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+1167%
6−7
−1167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1300%
4−5
−1300%
Valorant 140−150
+1133%
12−14
−1133%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+1267%
6−7
−1267%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Dota 2 110−120
+1133%
9−10
−1133%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1233%
6−7
−1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+1167%
6−7
−1167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1300%
4−5
−1300%
Valorant 140−150
+1133%
12−14
−1133%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+1200%
8−9
−1200%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+1340%
10−11
−1340%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1129%
14−16
−1129%
Valorant 180−190
+1207%
14−16
−1207%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1150%
4−5
−1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+1433%
3−4
−1433%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Valorant 110−120
+1167%
9−10
−1167%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Dota 2 65−70
+1260%
5−6
−1260%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%

This is how GTX 880M SLI and R8 M535DX compete in popular games:

  • GTX 880M SLI is 1133% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 19.55 1.60
Recency 12 March 2014 18 April 2017

GTX 880M SLI has a 1122% higher aggregate performance score.

R8 M535DX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R8 M535DX in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 880M SLI GeForce GTX 880M SLI
vs
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M
R8 M535DX Radeon R8 M535DX
vs
GT 735M GeForce GT 735M
GTX 880M SLI GeForce GTX 880M SLI
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
GTX 880M SLI GeForce GTX 880M SLI
vs
R8 M445DX R8 M445DX
GTX 880M SLI GeForce GTX 880M SLI
vs
R7 M340 R7 M340
GTX 880M SLI GTX 880M SLI
vs
GTX 765M SLI 765M SLI
GTX 880M SLI GeForce GTX 880M SLI
vs
R7 M350 R7 M350
GTX 880M SLI GeForce GTX 880M SLI
vs
R7 A360 R7 A360
GTX 880M SLI GeForce GTX 880M SLI
vs
RX 5500M RX 5500M
GTX 880M SLI GeForce GTX 880M SLI
vs
RX 6800 RX 6800
RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
vs
GTX 880M SLI 880M SLI
RTX 5080 RTX 5080
vs
GTX 880M SLI 880M SLI
RX 490M Radeon RX 490M
vs
ATI X300 LE Radeon X300 LE

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 880M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 35 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M535DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 880M SLI or Radeon R8 M535DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.