Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce GTX 880M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 880M SLI with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.

GTX 880M SLI
2014
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 206 Watt
20.75

PRO V710 outperforms GTX 880M SLI by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking283176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.1314.72
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameN15E-GX-A2Navi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2014 (11 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30723456
Core clock speed954 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors2x 3540 Million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)206 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rateno data432.0
Floating-point processing powerno data27.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB28 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD74
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−56.5%
180−190
+56.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−56.6%
130−140
+56.6%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−56.5%
180−190
+56.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−49.3%
100−105
+49.3%
Fortnite 100−110
−52.4%
160−170
+52.4%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−46.3%
120−130
+46.3%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−55.8%
120−130
+55.8%
Valorant 140−150
−55.4%
230−240
+55.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−56.6%
130−140
+56.6%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−56.5%
180−190
+56.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
−47.1%
350−400
+47.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Dota 2 110−120
−51.8%
170−180
+51.8%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−49.3%
100−105
+49.3%
Fortnite 100−110
−52.4%
160−170
+52.4%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−46.3%
120−130
+46.3%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−46.7%
110−120
+46.7%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−55.8%
120−130
+55.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−57.9%
90−95
+57.9%
Valorant 140−150
−55.4%
230−240
+55.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−56.6%
130−140
+56.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Dota 2 110−120
−51.8%
170−180
+51.8%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−49.3%
100−105
+49.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−46.3%
120−130
+46.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−55.8%
120−130
+55.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−57.9%
90−95
+57.9%
Valorant 140−150
−55.4%
230−240
+55.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−52.4%
160−170
+52.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−51.7%
220−230
+51.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−56.1%
270−280
+56.1%
Valorant 180−190
−55.9%
290−300
+55.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−57.9%
90−95
+57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−52.2%
70−75
+52.2%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−56.9%
80−85
+56.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−48.9%
70−75
+48.9%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−48.6%
55−60
+48.6%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%
Valorant 110−120
−55.2%
180−190
+55.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Dota 2 65−70
−44.9%
100−105
+44.9%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%

This is how GTX 880M SLI and PRO V710 compete in popular games:

  • PRO V710 is 49% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.75 32.88
Recency 12 March 2014 3 October 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 206 Watt 158 Watt

PRO V710 has a 58.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 30.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 880M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 880M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M SLI
GeForce GTX 880M SLI
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 12 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 880M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 880M SLI or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.