RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell vs GeForce GTX 880M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 880M SLI with RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

GTX 880M SLI
2014
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 206 Watt
19.44

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell outperforms 880M SLI by a whopping 341% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3117
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.3133.22
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameN15E-GX-A2GB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2014 (11 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307210496
Core clock speed954 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistors2x 3540 Million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)206 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data789.5
Floating-point processing powerno data50.53 TFLOPS
ROPsno data112
TMUsno data328
Tensor Coresno data328
Ray Tracing Coresno data82
L1 Cacheno data10.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA+12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD74
−305%
300−350
+305%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−339%
500−550
+339%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−319%
180−190
+319%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−336%
170−180
+336%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85
−322%
350−400
+322%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−339%
500−550
+339%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−319%
180−190
+319%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−331%
280−290
+331%
Fortnite 100−110
−329%
450−500
+329%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−332%
350−400
+332%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−329%
270−280
+329%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−336%
170−180
+336%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−290%
300−310
+290%
Valorant 140−150
−339%
650−700
+339%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85
−322%
350−400
+322%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−339%
500−550
+339%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
−322%
1000−1050
+322%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−319%
180−190
+319%
Dota 2 110−120
−302%
450−500
+302%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−331%
280−290
+331%
Fortnite 100−110
−329%
450−500
+329%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−332%
350−400
+332%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−329%
270−280
+329%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−305%
300−310
+305%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−336%
170−180
+336%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−319%
180−190
+319%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−290%
300−310
+290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−339%
250−260
+339%
Valorant 140−150
−339%
650−700
+339%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
−322%
350−400
+322%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−319%
180−190
+319%
Dota 2 110−120
−302%
450−500
+302%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−331%
280−290
+331%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−332%
350−400
+332%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−336%
170−180
+336%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−290%
300−310
+290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−339%
250−260
+339%
Valorant 140−150
−339%
650−700
+339%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
−329%
450−500
+329%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−339%
180−190
+339%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−314%
600−650
+314%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−329%
150−160
+329%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−336%
750−800
+336%
Valorant 180−190
−335%
800−850
+335%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
−339%
250−260
+339%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−321%
80−85
+321%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−322%
190−200
+322%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−340%
220−230
+340%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−332%
95−100
+332%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−319%
130−140
+319%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
−326%
200−210
+326%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−332%
160−170
+332%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−338%
70−75
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−314%
120−130
+314%
Valorant 110−120
−335%
500−550
+335%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
−319%
130−140
+319%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Dota 2 65−70
−326%
290−300
+326%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−335%
100−105
+335%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−329%
150−160
+329%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−325%
85−90
+325%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
−329%
90−95
+329%

This is how GTX 880M SLI and RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 305% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.44 85.75
Recency 12 March 2014 18 March 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 206 Watt 200 Watt

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has a 341.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 3% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 880M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 880M SLI is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M SLI
GeForce GTX 880M SLI
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 880M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 110 votes

Rate RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 880M SLI or RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.