GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs GTX 880M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
SLI
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 880M SLI with GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

GTX 880M SLI
2014
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 206 Watt
21.99

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms GTX 880M SLI by a whopping 253% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking2338
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.15
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameN15E-GX-A2AD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 March 2014 (10 years ago)17 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699
Current price$3098 $719 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 880M SLI and RTX 4070 SUPER have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30727168
Core clock speed954 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors2x 3540 Million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)206 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rateno data584.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 880M SLI and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 880M SLI 21.99
RTX 4070 SUPER 77.63
+253%

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms GTX 880M SLI by 253% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 880M SLI 15823
RTX 4070 SUPER 68373
+332%

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms GTX 880M SLI by 332% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 880M SLI 11817
RTX 4070 SUPER 48876
+314%

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms GTX 880M SLI by 314% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 880M SLI 77057
RTX 4070 SUPER 171098
+122%

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms GTX 880M SLI by 122% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
−197%
208
+197%
1440p35−40
−289%
136
+289%
4K21−24
−295%
83
+295%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 70−75 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90 no data
Metro Exodus 70−75 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 70−75 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90 no data
Metro Exodus 70−75 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 no data
Hitman 3 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−33 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 21−24 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 no data

This is how GTX 880M SLI and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 197% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 289% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 295% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.99 77.63
Recency 12 March 2014 17 January 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 206 Watt 220 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 880M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 880M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M SLI
GeForce GTX 880M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 12 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 880M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1899 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.