GeForce GT 710 vs GTX 880M SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 880M SLI with GeForce GT 710, including specs and performance data.

GTX 880M SLI
2014
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 206 Watt
21.62
+1226%

GTX 880M SLI outperforms GT 710 by a whopping 1226% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking256956
Place by popularitynot in top-10071
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Power efficiency7.205.88
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameN15E-GX-A2GK208
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 March 2014 (10 years ago)27 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$34.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072192
Core clock speed954 MHz954 MHz
Number of transistors2x 3540 Million915 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)206 Watt19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data95 °C
Texture fill rateno data15.26
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3663 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data2.713" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor supportno data3 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision-+
PureVideo-+
PhysX-+
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 880M SLI 21.62
+1226%
GT 710 1.63

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 880M SLI 11817
+1148%
GT 710 947

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 880M SLI 77057
+960%
GT 710 7270

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD77
+863%
8
−863%
1440p50−55
+1150%
4
−1150%
4K75−80
+1150%
6
−1150%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.37
1440pno data8.75
4Kno data5.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+700%
6−7
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+1340%
5−6
−1340%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+2450%
2−3
−2450%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+1350%
4−5
−1350%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+2560%
5−6
−2560%
Hitman 3 40−45
+617%
6−7
−617%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+550%
16−18
−550%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+1420%
5−6
−1420%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+1833%
3−4
−1833%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+711%
9−10
−711%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+182%
30−35
−182%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+700%
6−7
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+1340%
5−6
−1340%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+2450%
2−3
−2450%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+1350%
4−5
−1350%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+2560%
5−6
−2560%
Hitman 3 40−45
+617%
6−7
−617%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+550%
16−18
−550%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+1420%
5−6
−1420%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+1833%
3−4
−1833%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+1360%
5
−1360%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+300%
12−14
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+182%
30−35
−182%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+700%
6−7
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+2450%
2−3
−2450%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+2560%
5−6
−2560%
Hitman 3 40−45
+617%
6−7
−617%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+550%
16−18
−550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+1360%
5
−1360%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+1500%
3
−1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+182%
30−35
−182%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+1833%
3−4
−1833%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+1278%
9−10
−1278%
Hitman 3 24−27
+271%
7−8
−271%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+820%
5
−820%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+1488%
8−9
−1488%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Hitman 3 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+1313%
8−9
−1313%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+420%
5
−420%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%

This is how GTX 880M SLI and GT 710 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 880M SLI is 863% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 880M SLI is 1150% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 880M SLI is 1150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 880M SLI is 2560% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 880M SLI surpassed GT 710 in all 53 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.62 1.63
Power consumption (TDP) 206 Watt 19 Watt

GTX 880M SLI has a 1226.4% higher aggregate performance score.

GT 710, on the other hand, has 984.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 880M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce GT 710 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M SLI
GeForce GTX 880M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 12 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 880M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 4294 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.