Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking457not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.21no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameno dataWhistler
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 March 2014 (11 years ago)28 March 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280480
Core clock speed1029 MHz485 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1870 Million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rateno data11.64
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4656 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24
L1 Cacheno data48 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 March 2014 28 March 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 20 Watt

GTX 860M SLI has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7650M Rebrand, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M SLI
GeForce GTX 860M SLI
AMD Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand
Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 860M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 860M SLI or Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.