Radeon RX 6700S vs GeForce GTX 780M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon RX 6700S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 780M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
9.96

RX 6700S outperforms GTX 780M by a whopping 288% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking418108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.42no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN14E-GTXNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$1093 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361792
CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed823 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed797 MHz1890 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate102.0224.0
Floating-point performance2,448 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon RX 6700S compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB10 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP content protection+no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780M 9.96
RX 6700S 38.64
+288%

Radeon RX 6700S outperforms GeForce GTX 780M by 288% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 780M 3847
RX 6700S 14922
+288%

Radeon RX 6700S outperforms GeForce GTX 780M by 288% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 780M 7777
RX 6700S 32662
+320%

Radeon RX 6700S outperforms GeForce GTX 780M by 320% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 780M 26827
RX 6700S 75332
+181%

Radeon RX 6700S outperforms GeForce GTX 780M by 181% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 780M 5244
RX 6700S 24135
+360%

Radeon RX 6700S outperforms GeForce GTX 780M by 360% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 780M 35965
RX 6700S 153853
+328%

Radeon RX 6700S outperforms GeForce GTX 780M by 328% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD71
−62%
115
+62%
1440p16−18
−319%
67
+319%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−325%
65−70
+325%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−325%
65−70
+325%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−319%
113
+319%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−313%
120−130
+313%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−333%
75−80
+333%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−313%
99
+313%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−300%
80−85
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−300%
95−100
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−323%
140−150
+323%
Hitman 3 24−27
−313%
99
+313%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−290%
150−160
+290%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−311%
110−120
+311%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−343%
90−95
+343%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−313%
227
+313%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−304%
109
+304%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−325%
65−70
+325%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−343%
93
+343%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−313%
120−130
+313%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−333%
75−80
+333%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−311%
74
+311%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−300%
80−85
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−300%
95−100
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−323%
140−150
+323%
Hitman 3 12−14
−292%
47
+292%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−290%
150−160
+290%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−311%
110−120
+311%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−343%
90−95
+343%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−307%
183
+307%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−311%
144
+311%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−300%
95−100
+300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−325%
65−70
+325%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−339%
79
+339%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−333%
75−80
+333%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−329%
60
+329%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−300%
80−85
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−323%
140−150
+323%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−290%
150−160
+290%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−293%
157
+293%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−300%
84
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−321%
59
+321%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−343%
90−95
+343%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−311%
70−75
+311%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−329%
90−95
+329%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−320%
40−45
+320%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−308%
49
+308%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−321%
55−60
+321%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−343%
31
+343%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−339%
79
+339%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−350%
80−85
+350%
Hitman 3 12−14
−308%
49
+308%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−300%
80−85
+300%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−300%
70−75
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−343%
90−95
+343%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−300%
55−60
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−322%
38
+322%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−313%
65−70
+313%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−290%
35−40
+290%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Hitman 3 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−308%
45−50
+308%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−360%
45−50
+360%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−317%
24−27
+317%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−350%
50−55
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−308%
45−50
+308%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%

This is how GTX 780M and RX 6700S compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700S is 62% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700S is 319% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.96 38.64
Recency 30 May 2013 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 80 Watt

The Radeon RX 6700S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GeForce GTX 780M
AMD Radeon RX 6700S
Radeon RX 6700S

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 106 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 203 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.