Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 780M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780M SLI with Radeon Pro 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780M SLI
2013
2x 4 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
18.85

Pro 5700 XT outperforms GTX 780M SLI by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking294173
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.7417.35
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameN14E-GTXNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722560
Core clock speed823 MHz1243 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1499 MHz
Number of transistors7080 Million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rateno data239.8
Floating-point processing powerno data7.675 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD98
−63.3%
160−170
+63.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−61.3%
100−105
+61.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−63.5%
85−90
+63.5%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−60.4%
85−90
+60.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Valorant 75−80
−64.6%
130−140
+64.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−61.3%
100−105
+61.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Dota 2 65−70
−59.4%
110−120
+59.4%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−53.8%
100−105
+53.8%
Fortnite 100−110
−63.5%
170−180
+63.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−63.5%
85−90
+63.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
−59.4%
110−120
+59.4%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−60.4%
85−90
+60.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−66.7%
220−230
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−63.9%
100−105
+63.9%
Valorant 75−80
−64.6%
130−140
+64.6%
World of Tanks 257
−55.6%
400−450
+55.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−61.3%
100−105
+61.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Dota 2 65−70
−59.4%
110−120
+59.4%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−53.8%
100−105
+53.8%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−63.5%
85−90
+63.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−66.7%
220−230
+66.7%
Valorant 75−80
−64.6%
130−140
+64.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Dota 2 30−35
−61.3%
50−55
+61.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−61.3%
50−55
+61.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−64.7%
280−290
+64.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
World of Tanks 130−140
−65.4%
220−230
+65.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−63.5%
85−90
+63.5%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−60%
80−85
+60%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−61.3%
50−55
+61.3%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Valorant 50−55
−60%
80−85
+60%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Dota 2 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−61%
95−100
+61%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Dota 2 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Fortnite 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Valorant 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%

This is how GTX 780M SLI and Pro 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5700 XT is 63% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.85 31.57
Recency 30 May 2013 4 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 130 Watt

Pro 5700 XT has a 67.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 53.8% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
GeForce GTX 780M SLI
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 43 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.