Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs GeForce GTX 780M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780M SLI and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 780M SLI
2013
2x 4 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
16.78
+157%

GTX 780M SLI outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking298541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.6718.55
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameN14E-GTXTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307280
Core clock speed823 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors7080 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt28 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GBno data
Memory bus width2x 256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed5000 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112_1
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 780M SLI 16.78
+157%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 6.53

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 780M SLI 14140
+165%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5332

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 780M SLI 36004
+65.7%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 780M SLI 10091
+152%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 4010

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 780M SLI 66148
+202%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21931

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 780M SLI 133
+203%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 44

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+421%
19
−421%
1440p21−24
+133%
9
−133%
4K35−40
+150%
14
−150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+109%
23
−109%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+239%
31
−239%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+179%
14
−179%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+200%
16
−200%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+192%
26
−192%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+338%
24
−338%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+225%
12
−225%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+210%
20
−210%
Fortnite 95−100
+128%
40−45
−128%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+134%
30−35
−134%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+176%
21
−176%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+165%
24−27
−165%
Valorant 130−140
+82.9%
75−80
−82.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+300%
12
−300%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+230%
23
−230%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+775%
12
−775%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 257
+125%
110−120
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+290%
10
−290%
Dota 2 100−110
+172%
39
−172%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+226%
19
−226%
Fortnite 95−100
+128%
40−45
−128%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+134%
30−35
−134%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+190%
20
−190%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+431%
13
−431%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+225%
12
−225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+165%
24−27
−165%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+136%
22
−136%
Valorant 130−140
+82.9%
75−80
−82.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+230%
23
−230%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+333%
9
−333%
Dota 2 100−110
+194%
36
−194%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+244%
18
−244%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+134%
30−35
−134%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+165%
24−27
−165%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+373%
11
−373%
Valorant 130−140
+82.9%
75−80
−82.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+128%
40−45
−128%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+217%
12−14
−217%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+142%
55−60
−142%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+417%
6
−417%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+328%
35−40
−328%
Valorant 170−180
+119%
80−85
−119%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+271%
14−16
−271%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+183%
6
−183%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+242%
12
−242%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+171%
16−18
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+200%
10
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Valorant 100−110
+186%
35−40
−186%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Dota 2 60−65
+294%
16
−294%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+191%
10−12
−191%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%

This is how GTX 780M SLI and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780M SLI is 421% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 780M SLI is 133% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 780M SLI is 150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 780M SLI is 775% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 780M SLI surpassed Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.78 6.53
Recency 30 May 2013 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 28 Watt

GTX 780M SLI has a 157% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 614.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
GeForce GTX 780M SLI
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 962 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780M SLI or Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.