GeForce GTX 765M vs 780M Mac Edition
Aggregate performance score
780M Mac Edition outperforms 765M by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 532 | 586 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.13 | 0.53 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | GK104 | N14-GE |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 November 2013 (10 years ago) | 30 May 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Current price | $149 | $93 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GTX 780M Mac Edition has 113% better value for money than GTX 765M.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 768 |
| CUDA cores | no data | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,540 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 | 55.23 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition and GeForce GTX 765M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Bus support | no data | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Width | MXM Module | no data |
| SLI options | no data | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Standard memory configuration | no data | GDDR5 |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | no data | Up to 3840x2160 |
| LVDS signal support | no data | Up to 1920x1200 |
| VGA аnalog display support | no data | Up to 2048x1536 |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | no data | Up to 3840x2160 |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| HDCP content protection | no data | + |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | no data | + |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | no data | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | no data | + |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | no data | + |
| Optimus | no data | + |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 65−70
+27.5%
| 51
−27.5%
|
| Full HD | 55−60
+27.9%
| 43
−27.9%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.69 | 5.16 |
| Recency | 8 November 2013 | 30 May 2013 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 75 Watt |
The GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 765M in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 765M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
