Iris Plus Graphics vs GeForce GTX 780

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	245	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	16.68	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Generation 11.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GK110	Ice Lake GT2
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	23 May 2013 (10 years ago)	no data
Launch price (MSRP)	$649	no data
Current price	$100 (0.2x MSRP)	$870

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	512
CUDA cores	2304	no data
Core clock speed	863 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	1000 MHz
Number of transistors	7,080 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	95 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	160.5 billion/sec	32.00
Floating-point performance	4,156 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Minimum recommended system power	600 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	One 8-pin and one 6-pin	no data

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	384 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	288.4 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data
PhysX	+	no data
3D Vision Live	+	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	no data
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---