GeForce MX570 vs GTX 780

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 with GeForce MX570, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
20.73
+39.2%

GTX 780 outperforms GeForce MX570 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking247332
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.08no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGK110GN20-S5
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data
Current price$100 (0.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042048
CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed863 MHzno data
Boost clock speed900 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15-45 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate160.5 billion/sec73.92
Floating-point performance4,156 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 780 and GeForce MX570 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Minimum recommended system power600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectorsOne 8-pin and one 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
PhysX+no data
Optimusno data+
3D Vision Live+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780 20.73
+39.2%
GeForce MX570 14.89

GTX 780 outperforms MX570 by 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 780 8007
+39.3%
GeForce MX570 5749

GTX 780 outperforms MX570 by 39% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD54
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+20%
24−27
−20%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+35.4%
45−50
−35.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+35.7%
70−75
−35.7%
Hitman 3 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+33.3%
60−65
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+32.7%
45−50
−32.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+31%
40−45
−31%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+38.3%
45−50
−38.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+35.4%
45−50
−35.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+20%
24−27
−20%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+35.4%
45−50
−35.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+35.7%
70−75
−35.7%
Hitman 3 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+33.3%
60−65
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+32.7%
45−50
−32.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+31%
40−45
−31%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+38.3%
45−50
−38.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+29%
30−35
−29%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+35.4%
45−50
−35.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+20%
24−27
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+35.7%
70−75
−35.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+33.3%
60−65
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+38.3%
45−50
−38.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+29%
30−35
−29%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+35.4%
45−50
−35.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+31%
40−45
−31%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+25%
27−30
−25%
Hitman 3 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Hitman 3 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%

This is how GTX 780 and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780 is 54% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.73 14.89
Recency 23 May 2013 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

The GeForce GTX 780 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 is a desktop card while GeForce MX570 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1001 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 70 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.