GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs GTX 780 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Ti with GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780 Ti
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
22.33

RTX 5050 Mobile outperforms GTX 780 Ti by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking262102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.42no data
Power efficiency6.8162.41
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGK110BGB207
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 November 2013 (11 years ago)24 June 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28802560
Core clock speed875 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed928 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate222.7201.6
Floating-point processing power5.345 TFLOPS12.9 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs24080
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth336 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA+12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 780 Ti 22.33
RTX 5050 Mobile 40.92
+83.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 780 Ti 9460
RTX 5050 Mobile 17335
+83.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96
−77.1%
170−180
+77.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.28no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−73.5%
220−230
+73.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−96%
95−100
+96%
Sons of the Forest 45−50
−79.6%
85−90
+79.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−50%
130−140
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−73.5%
220−230
+73.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−96%
95−100
+96%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−77.3%
130−140
+77.3%
Fortnite 110−120
−55.7%
170−180
+55.7%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−73.9%
160−170
+73.9%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
−80.6%
130−140
+80.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−78.9%
160−170
+78.9%
Sons of the Forest 45−50
−79.6%
85−90
+79.6%
Valorant 160−170
−47.8%
230−240
+47.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−50%
130−140
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−73.5%
220−230
+73.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−10.2%
280−290
+10.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−96%
95−100
+96%
Dota 2 120−130
−75%
210−220
+75%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−77.3%
130−140
+77.3%
Fortnite 110−120
−55.7%
170−180
+55.7%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−73.9%
160−170
+73.9%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
−80.6%
130−140
+80.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
−60.7%
130−140
+60.7%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−102%
100−110
+102%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−78.9%
160−170
+78.9%
Sons of the Forest 45−50
−79.6%
85−90
+79.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−124%
150−160
+124%
Valorant 160−170
−47.8%
230−240
+47.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−50%
130−140
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−96%
95−100
+96%
Dota 2 120−130
−75%
210−220
+75%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−77.3%
130−140
+77.3%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−73.9%
160−170
+73.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−78.9%
160−170
+78.9%
Sons of the Forest 45−50
−79.6%
85−90
+79.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−124%
150−160
+124%
Valorant 160−170
−80.1%
290−300
+80.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
−55.7%
170−180
+55.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−118%
100−110
+118%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−77.4%
290−300
+77.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−110%
85−90
+110%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−100%
60−65
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−72.4%
300−310
+72.4%
Valorant 200−210
−34%
260−270
+34%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−64.1%
100−110
+64.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−92.5%
100−110
+92.5%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−107%
120−130
+107%
Sons of the Forest 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−122%
80−85
+122%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−104%
110−120
+104%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−116%
90−95
+116%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−105%
35−40
+105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−100%
65−70
+100%
Valorant 130−140
−88.8%
250−260
+88.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−91.4%
65−70
+91.4%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
Dota 2 75−80
−71.1%
130−140
+71.1%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−111%
55−60
+111%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−97.6%
80−85
+97.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−146%
55−60
+146%
Sons of the Forest 18−20
−117%
35−40
+117%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−124%
55−60
+124%

This is how GTX 780 Ti and RTX 5050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5050 Mobile is 77% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5050 Mobile is 146% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 5050 Mobile surpassed GTX 780 Ti in all 59 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.33 40.92
Recency 7 November 2013 24 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 5050 Mobile has a 83.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Ti is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 694 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 69 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Ti or GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.