GeForce Go 6600 vs GTX 780 Ti

Place in the ranking	220	1401
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.33	no data
Power efficiency	6.89	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	GK110B	NV43 A2
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	7 November 2013 (11 years ago)	29 September 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2880	12
Core clock speed	875 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	928 MHz	375 MHz
Number of transistors	7,080 million	146 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	222.7	2.400
Floating-point processing power	5.345 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	4
TMUs	240	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-II
Length	267 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	350 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336 GB/s	11.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	-
3D Gaming	+	-
3D Vision	+	-
3D Vision Live	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	5.1	3.0
OpenGL	4.4	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780 Ti 24.70
+13622%

Go 6600 0.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 780 Ti 9527
+13707%

Go 6600 69

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p

7.06

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45
+1900%

2−3

−1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +1700%	3−4 −1700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45	0−1
Battlefield 5	80−85	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +2400%	2−3 −2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +1900%	2−3 −1900%
Far Cry 5	55−60	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +14300%	1−2 −14300%
Hitman 3	50−55 +1150%	4−5 −1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +1325%	8−9 −1325%
Metro Exodus	85−90	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +1975%	4−5 −1975%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +264%	27−30 −264%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +1700%	3−4 −1700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45	0−1
Battlefield 5	80−85	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +2400%	2−3 −2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +1900%	2−3 −1900%
Far Cry 5	55−60	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +14300%	1−2 −14300%
Hitman 3	50−55 +1150%	4−5 −1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +1325%	8−9 −1325%
Metro Exodus	85−90	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +1975%	4−5 −1975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +489%	9−10 −489%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +264%	27−30 −264%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +1700%	3−4 −1700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +2400%	2−3 −2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +1900%	2−3 −1900%
Far Cry 5	55−60	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +14300%	1−2 −14300%
Hitman 3	50−55 +1150%	4−5 −1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +1325%	8−9 −1325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +1975%	4−5 −1975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +489%	9−10 −489%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +264%	27−30 −264%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	0−1
Far Cry 5	27−30	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +14000%	1−2 −14000%
Hitman 3	27−30 +383%	6−7 −383%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +2450%	2−3 −2450%
Metro Exodus	45−50	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +13900%	1−2 −13900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+1950%

2−3

−1950%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20	0−1
Hitman 3	18−20	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130	0−1
Metro Exodus	27−30	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	0−1
Far Cry 5	14−16	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	30−35	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+950%

2−3

−950%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 780 Ti is 2450% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GTX 780 Ti surpassed Go 6600 in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.70	0.18
Recency	7 November 2013	29 September 2005
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	110 nm

GTX 780 Ti has a 13622.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6600 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce Go 6600 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.